Agents use facial recognition, social media monitoring and other tech tools not only to identify undocumented immigrants but also to track protesters, current and former officials said.

  • ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Those are fascist states too. You can’t make use of this kind of technology and still claim to be the good guys. Fascisms not a left or right thing, both sides of the aisle can slide into that kind of behavior.

    • BlueDemon@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Authoritarianism applies to both sides, and the middle. Fascism is a right wing authoritarian ideology.

      • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        No, it’s in principle undetermined in ideology. Historical ones, even Stalin or Pol Pot variants, were rather right wing. But the only principles really important for any kind of fascism are violence, anti-rationalism and amorphous ideology.

        EDIT: What I mean is that fascism is that “third way”, not left-wing or right-wing. And has made situational alliances with things from both. That was its main difference from old conservatives in the beginning of XX century.

          • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Non-leftist doesn’t equal right-wing. Anarcho-capitalism is right-wing, but opposite from fascism.

            Fascism requires no logical structure and no coherence in ideology. It requires the ideology to be bendable all ways each moment for each different situation. Which, well, is natural for an ideology reliant upon violence and emotion above all.

            That leftists try to mix fascism and normal conservatism is a purely leftist sexual problem, that doesn’t concern others until leftists pretend it’s commonly accepted.

            Then, of course, when most of the “revolutionary” competition is leftist, fascism becomes anti-leftist and allies right-wing forces.

            But also Nazi and Soviet propaganda on the British Empire were amazingly similar in archetypes and emotion. Which would be a rare case of “fascism against right-wing forces”.

        • doben@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          Oh, the historical fascisms such as under Stalin and Pol Pot, right.

          it’s in principle undetermined in ideology

          Correct in so far, as it‘s determined by economic system. Which happens to align with left/right ideology.

          But the only principles really important for any kind of fascism are violence, anti-rationalism and amorphous ideology.

          You’re making shit up depending on how your tummy feels, don‘t you?

          Please stop using the internet.

          • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            7 hours ago

            How to detect a commie idiot without them naming themselves.

            I’m actually using Eco’s version, and he’s notably leftist.

            Please stop using the internet.

            Smart thoughts were chasing you, but you were always faster.

              • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                Eco’s version assumes Stalin’s regime is one of primary fascist regimes in the first place. I dunno about that overview, in the original text it’s clear from the beginning. Either you haven’t read it or you are trying to cheat.

            • doben@lemmy.wtf
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              6 hours ago

              I would have been more impressed, if you‘d actually provided argumentative content instead of personal attacks.

              Not sure, what you used Umberto Eco‘s definition for, but it wasn‘t to formulate a coherent thought on the topic.

              • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                5 hours ago

                Not sure, what you used Umberto Eco‘s definition for, but it wasn‘t to formulate a coherent thought on the topic.

                Thank you for your opinion, but for classifying Stalin and Pol Pot as fascist, at the very least. If you have actually read that definition.

                You’re making shit up depending on how your tummy feels, don‘t you?

                vs

                if you‘d actually provided argumentative content instead personal attacks.

                and

                Correct in so far, as it‘s determined by economic system. Which happens to align with left/right ideology.

                , I don’t even know, “idiot” doesn’t seem a personal attack in such a situation. Commies are the only kind of people claiming that fascism has any economic alignments, as far as I have seen.

        • fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 hours ago

          No it’s not entirely clearly defined. But a few elements appear in all of them: Anti- communism/socialism, dictator, far-right idiologies, nationalism…

          I wouldn’t say any if these are desired by leftism, or rather opposites.

      • ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I did some reading, it seems I had a misunderstanding of some of the finer details. Perhaps authoritarian or totalitarianism are better terms? I’m not sure, but regardless, I fail to see how many of the tactics of fascism couldn’t be employed by the political left, which I guess is the point I was originally getting at.

        • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          I fail to see how many of the tactics of fascism

          Leftism overtly opposes the tools of fascism: sexism, racism, imperialism, nationalism, etc.

          Maybe you should more reading before posting about this topic.