He was arrested and detained for hours, during which he was subjected to humiliating examinations. The good thing is that he had recorded everything with a camera. The investigation results proved his innocence
He was arrested and detained for hours, during which he was subjected to humiliating examinations. The good thing is that he had recorded everything with a camera. The investigation results proved his innocence
To all the morons that disregard this because it’s the daily mail, the story is reported multiple other places:
https://5pillarsuk.com/2026/02/10/woman-jailed-for-falsely-accusing-exemplary-muslim-of-raping-her-after-drunken-night-out/
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/38126742/mum-falsely-claimed-raped-good-samaritan/
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/2167138/good-samaritans-rape-hoax-hell
Lol, you’ve linked two more shit papers. I’m not aware of 5pillars so that could also be shit
For fucks sake, I took the 3 first that Google showed me, I’m sure there are loads more.
As it is, there is zero reason to think the story is false.
They may be shit papers, but there are still rules about what is allowed for a paper to print in UK.
I puke that you are upvoted for just saying bwuah bwuah your sources are shit, while you admit to not even knowing one of them, and you show NOTHING yourself.
🤮 🤮 🤮
You are a worthless debater contributing nothing.
Just whining over the quality of 4 independent sources!
Who said the story is false?
Plus what’s wrong with complaining about the quality of sources?
The only person who is whining is you