![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/pictrs/image/a18b0c69-23c9-4b2a-b8e0-3aca0172390d.png)
Either way there are a lot more contexts where one can use slut and not be shitty.
True, but I don’t think that’s the case here.
Either way there are a lot more contexts where one can use slut and not be shitty.
True, but I don’t think that’s the case here.
There’s no “punching down”, unlike with the antiquated ‘R’ word…
Women can’t be “punched down” on? News to me…
Sex shaming is fun?
If that happens, they just fall back to the first option of waiting for their provider to set up the IPMI.
No, yuzu’s main problem was being a for-profit company. That seemed to be central to Nintendo’s case against them. The company behind yuzu was making millions.
In what way is the Linux kernel proprietary?
Are they a good choice if you only need to print a few times a year? I thought laser printers are better for that since there’s no ink to dry out.
TBH I totally thought they were the same person/group until now. Not really into the cracking scene, though…
I thought 90% was defeating DRM and 10% was reducing download size. Doesn’t matter how quick the download is if DRM blocks you from running the game.
I don’t pirate games (any more) but my understanding is that FitGirl is one of the few crackers who can defeat denuvo, which means the only choice for pirates is repack.
None of my mobile devices are “necessary,” though. Honestly, I could live just fine without an internet connection. Not that I’d enjoy it, but that’s not necessary.
“Necessary” is a little ambiguous. You could argue that wifi is unnecessary for a normal home network.
Here’s my use-case, I’m pretty sure the first 2 are pretty common (common enough to be supported by most OEM firmware):
Openwrt works great for gigabit networks with simple firewall rules and no IPS. But used 10-56gbps enterprise equipment is getting pretty cheap, and more complicated firewall configurations need more powerful hardware than the typical openwrt router.
And 56gbps on a home LAN might be overkill, but that’s not important.
Their contacts are most likely protected by NDAs, but they’re also written by lawyers who know how to close loopholes. There’s no way a SIG like the HDMI forum would allow members to release compatible products without following the rules.
Even if it isn’t covered by the contract, the other members could hold a vote to remove AMD from the forum.
No, they can’t. AMD is a member of the HDMI forum, which means they’re contractually obligated to follow the forum’s rules. In exchange, they get voting rights on decisions like this one, the right to propose changes to the HDMI standards, technical details that are protected by NDAs, etc. They wouldn’t throw that all away and open themselves up to a lawsuit just for their OSS drivers.
Same reason insider trading laws don’t affect congress members…
Confirmed?
We’re pretty much at the point where 2.5" SSDs are old…
If I misunderstood your post, it wasn’t intentional. Would you mind elaborating?