AmidFuror

Could be mRNA. Could be gRNA. But I think this article wants them in all caps.

CDNA is actually DNA made using RNA as a template. Very important for the viral ecosystem.

A ChatGPT reply is generally clear, concise, and informative. It aims to address your question or topic directly and provide relevant information. The responses are crafted to be engaging and helpful, tailored to the context of the conversation while maintaining a neutral and professional tone.

One argument in favor of bots on social media is their ability to automate routine tasks and provide instant responses. For example, bots can handle customer service inquiries, offer real-time updates, and manage repetitive interactions, which can enhance user experience and free up human moderators for more complex tasks. Additionally, they can help in disseminating important information quickly and efficiently, especially in emergency situations or for public awareness campaigns.

To subterranean levels.

Do I have to decline providing a method of payment 4 times for free apps, or just the once?

You can have the next quip.

Brain cancer, no. Brain rot, yes.

What you wrote is essentially true of Li+ ion batteries (not truly green unless the electricity is too). The part I was missing was the efficiency of electrolysis being half that of Li+ charging.

Fuel cells can also run cars, and refilling is much faster than recharging. So you can build cars which can go long ranges with quick stops. But of course the infrastructure for hydrogen fuel is well behind even car chargers, let alone gasoline.

I’m not sure what you meant by your first sentence. There are words missing. But any energy conversion will have efficiency losses. That includes for lithium batteries too.

Hydrogen should be used for portable energy, like you said. Are electric cars also not considered green unless they are charged with non-fossil fuel sources? I think everyone understands that they enable us to use other energy sources but they don’t in and of themselves reduce dependence.

We also have bands of fossil animals and plants that extend across the split. There’s lots not of support for Pangea.

You’re probably just not tapped into any of the informal networks that are spreading CP on those platforms.

You’re not using the right search terms?

Can’t I skinny dip once without NASA spying on me?

Your mom knows which cousin, but she ain’t gonna tell.

Oddly enough, that source doesn’t imply soft tissues were preserved. They can tell some things about its brain and guts based on outlines left behind. And also from what they know of other arthropod fossils from the same era - undercutting the uniqueness.

This one is special because it isn’t smushed flat like most fossils in this deposit.

I think you mean opinionated headlines. But you’re right. This post is trash. Disney did a bad thing, but it’s nothing like what’s in the post title (which isn’t the article headline).

Disney is arguing the case should go to arbitration, not that it is legal for them to kill someone. Obviously their argument in arbitration would be that is isn’t their fault the death occured.

I guess it’s a “core sample” from drilling, but the headline made me do a double take. I was first wondering how you get a sample of the Earth’s core from the mantle.

Someone buy that mouse some flowers.

Why “athletes” in scare quotes?

The only reason Russia isn’t directly participating in the games is their athletes are dopers. You think otherwise Russia is a stand-up country? Yet their “athletes” (?) are there.