As I said, body hair on women might have a purpose in societies which are not technologically advanced

Due to the technological advancement we have conditioned ourselves to think this, but as “the architect” designed we have it and we’re supposed to like it (by your “architect” logic). It’d be like if your house was designed with window screens but you didn’t like them so you took them off, they were put there by the architect for a reason and you are altering the house by taking them away. We’re supposed to believe that altering the same house by adding a coat of paint is bad, yet altering it by removing window screens is A-Ok.

The crux of your issue seems to be that you’re so theistic you believe some immortal being directly beams thoughts to your head individually, and thus those thoughts must be “what god intended.” Since it’s no longer 0BC the rest of us know you’re not really talking to the bush.

You came up with a bad hypothesis and then backed it up with a shoddy study that doesn’t draw the conclusions you think it does. Correlation != causation, and I doubt the studies mention “cause god said so” anywhere anyway. It doesn’t make sense because you’re reading too deep into these studies in an attempt to justify your biases through your religious framework.

Know what? If god didn’t want us to get tattoos he wouldn’t have invented tattoo guns, same as razors, howboutdat?

The Creator made men find body hair on women unattractive

Nah he made the hair and made the reproductive mechanism we call sex which is fueled by attraction, clearly the intent (which frankly is a ridiculous concept to argue w.r.t biology so I guess we’re working within a religious framework at this point, biology cannot have “intent,” being a concept) was that we be attracted to the hair God put there, the attraction to hairlessness was born relatively recently to homo sapiens’ existence. I’d believe relative hairlessness is attractive to our species as a whole through a holdover of self selecting us VS neanderthals, except that we didn’t war them to extinction, we interbred.

Frankly shaving at all is spitting in God’s face removing the hair he created you with, by the “architect” logic.

So do guys like tattoos on girls? Most guys do find tattoos on women attractive

So you again dispute your own argument that all tattoos are interpreted by the brain as “blemishes” and therefore “sickness.” If you won’t listen to my argument at least listen to yours.

as long as they are feminine, delicate,

And women? Do they have the same requirements w.r.t attractive tattoos on men, or do they prefer tattoos that are manly and tough? Perhaps straight men just prefer women who are feminine and delicate, which duh, and this tattoo preference is an extension of that. It also applies to facial features, hairstyles, clothes, so why wouldn’t it extend to tattoos?

I conclude that you conjure conclusions where there are none. Do you come from a country or culture that actually does view tattoos that way, like Japan or (apparently) Korea, by chance? Just a hunch. Japan thinks tattoos are only for criminals, for instance.

No I know most people don’t know, this is the “expert” (not that expert but in context) informing. Wasn’t trying to be a dick.

Tbf, and I know you’re just trolling anyway but, that blew your “architect” argument out of the water here.

Architect for people here would mean our “creator,” or a metaphor for biology for the non-religious. So the “architect” put the hair on the women, as you say he designed them that way, and thus the alteration (removal) should be perceived as sickness, I should suspect Alopecia, but it isn’t and I don’t. Instead as your source suggests and as I can confirm for me personally I do prefer such a woman altered beyond our architect’s designs, I don’t see her as sick, I can correctly surmise that she, a tool using primate like myself, likely purchased a razor from a store and removed the hair from where it originally was.

As with the hair even if the tattoo “should” be viewed as a sickness due to a malfunction of our brains, in mine it isn’t. As with “shaving” I’m also aware of what “ink” is, tattooed or sharpied frankly, if I see someone wrote a phone number on their wrist (a forgotten rite of passage in the age of the smart phone but for those of us old enough to remember) or an X on their hand I don’t think “sick” I think “got a date” or “is under 21 at this band’s show” respectively, as my brain (perhaps unlike yours) is capable of interpreting context.

Furthermore many blemishes are not only “non-medical” (birthmarks, etc) some can be downright attractive. Love me a hot pale freckled woman.

Banksy isn’t graffiti, he’s street art. They’re cousins but there is a difference.

And he’s not that good, he ripped off Blek Le Rat. And he has no respect for his predecessors, going over King Robbo (RIP.) I’ll take a bomber like JA XTC or MQ, or a freight king like Ichabod or Jase over Banksy any day, personally.

Depends highly on the city/town, not everywhere is super active 24/7, some cities do sleep.

It also can’t be cleaned off as fast as paint, and costs more to replace.

Or

Put a fucking bullet in it. Or ~100. Birdshot should do nicely.

The contract will include a carve out to ensure that the A.I. model is not used on Americans’ data, said the officials, who added that the White House wants the contract to serve as a model for other companies.

Mmhmm, sure.

Psst, torrenting was invented in 2001. Back in the old days of which you speak it was entirely sneakernet (sometimes you’d rent the mail’s sneakers).

“Torrents” doesn’t mean “piracy,” it means the bittorrent p2p protocol specifically. If you download something today off Usenet it’s not torrenting.

Depends on where, they’re legal in most countries despite their rep. Apparently the UK hates them though. They’re legal in Canada again however.

Thanks for the info, I’ll pick these up next time I have to replace the pods I have!

I wish. 3.5mm jacks have been murdered by phone OEMs and I’m actually angry about it, and I’m not into extra wear and tear on my only charge port. They either need to put back the 3.5mm or give me two USB-C ports.

Ooh thank you these could also work!

Dude I might actually grab a pair of these for my next, thank you so much! JBL is good enough for me, not the best but their speakers run well and sound alright, and that’s perfect!

In that case I’ll be fine, but tbh I’d like better ones anyway were they to exist.

For now.

If only I could find them lol. I you have any specific brands to look for I desperately need them, afaik bose, sennheiser, grado, beats, those podcast ones, all do the inside the hole thing. Bose has some weird clip ones but I can’t justify spending $200 on them to see if they’ll work for me when they very well may not.

Fuck.

Anyone know of any good headphones that have the airpod in-ear shape? (Like these)

Hate the Skullcandy style with the shitty rubber nubs, those hurt my ears. (Like these)

But that’s all anyone makes now other than airpods non-pro and cheap shitty airpod knockoffs (but I still want halfway decent headphones.)

No it isn’t “just the wrong size” don’t bother with that, I just have way too tight ear pussies and I need it to rest outside the hole like the first pic.

Guys, learn to pirate. If you stick to media and familiarize yourself with filetypes (also enable file extensions, windows users. Chaps my ass that they’re hidden by default) then you’ll be fine. Nicotine+ for music, qbittorrent+jackett for movies/tv, or the *arr stack if you’re fancy, or Usenet if you’re paying for it.

Edit: Also use a VPN. I know “but that’s a thing to pay for,” my dude you should be using one anyway. I recommend Mullvad, maybe Proton.