• 0 Posts
  • 24 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 25th, 2024

help-circle









  • Asetru@feddit.orgtolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldAverage systemd debate
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    systemd gets stuck because it’s trying to mount two separate partitions to the same mount point

    Uh… Sounds like it’s not really systemd’s fault, your setup is just terrible.

    I’ve tried fixing it, but all I did was break it more.

    If you’re unable to fix it, maybe get somebody else? Like, this doesn’t sound like it’s an unfixable issue…



  • For all the non opti game who take more than 100Go of space ? Multiple DVD/Blu-ray ?

    Yes. That’s how it was done before, no reason to not do this now. Wing Commander 4 came on 6 CDs. As you progressed through the game, you kept advancing through them.

    Update: actually if a game need a update how to do this ? Download a zip file to apply the patch ? Possibility to directly write the patch on the DVD/Blu-ray for future install ?

    As Blu Rays are read only, you obviously can’t apply the patch there. The patches were always downloaded and applied to the game parts you had on your hard drive. What was wrong with that?

    If we use DVD/Blu-ray we need a player to install the game

    You need a device to read physical media to actually read physical media, yes.

    it’s not how things work now

    It’s not how things work because games that came on physical media had literally no advantage anymore at some point. With physical media just being used to speed up the first install in your always-online environment and bandwidth being no longer an issue, they just became obsolete. If I could have played half life 2 without steam using my disc, it would have been worth keeping. With the box being essentially just a bulky envelope for a product key, it turned out to be just a hassle.

    At some point, steam will enshittify or shut down. That’s when we will realize that online only distribution might not have been such a great idea.







  • How is Spotify supposed to “handle” anything here if the rights owner tells them that this is how it works? Like, not only didn’t the first rights owner give them any means to stay updated with the rights, the new rights owner didn’t notify them either that any rights were transferred to them before taking them to court. The only way to properly handle this would have been to tell them to get fucked, but that’s not really an alternative if we’re talking about the streaming rights for Eminem. This all seems like a setup to sue them… But who am I to tell? I’m just a jerk who read an article online. You know who should decide whether or not this was a scheme to drag Spotify to court? A judge.

    Oh, wait, they did. Guess it’s decided, then.



  • That list issue you mentioned really confused me, so here’s what’s in the article about it:

    The judge also noted that Spotify’s agreement with Kobalt did not include a database of the songs it could, and could not, stream.

    “Kobalt’s primary stated reason for that approach is that the catalogue of a large administrator like Kobalt would be routinely changing, rendering any list almost immediately out of date,” she wrote.

    So…

    • It’s not Spotify who’s behaving weirdly here but the rights holder and
    • the judge doesn’t just seem to be okay with it, but this is mentioned as another thing that added to the impression that the rights holder made it deliberately hard for Spotify to properly determine if it had the rights to stream a song.