Debian is the best defense of the incident and I couldn’t find the exact opposite way to them by now I am little bit of a political symbol that I am little more about business and I don’t want you

Ah yes, everyone else fault. Not that you come in here with the dumbest claim, refuse to explain it, and then just try to shit on everyone calling you out on your idiocy.

And what is you think west does that it always has? You can never say anything specific. It’s always vague nonsense.

NATO is a military alliance. Being part of NATO does not grant you any benefits in any market beyond perhaps weapon sales.

Being part of NATO has no meaning when it comes to game development, and sales, global otherwise.

So again. I ask the question. Why do you think NATO has anything to do with the topic?

What point is it you think he made clear?

If they want to protect their developers. They would help them succeed on the global market. Make it easier for them to compete.

I don’t think you have the slightest clue about what NATO actually is.

Because they have nothing to do with Vietnam choosing to ban steam.

What exactly do you think NATO has to do with this situation?

Love how people like you have to bring in NATO into everything. As if it has anything to do with Vietnam banning Steam.

Any normal distro. Kids learn fast. No one taught me how to use Windows 95, or XP. We figured it out.

I blew in Debian on my Microsoft Surface Pro4. It runs so much better and battery lasts longer too. It’s the shitty 4GB ram version so it was freezing a lot on Windows. Way less on Debian

Indeed. I know someone who bought the latest mac laptop. Very expensive, as they are. And all it’s used for is browsing the internet.

And when I say that’s all it’s used for I mean it.

People are laughing because it took them more than 30 years to figure that out.

GPL Licensed RIP in peace.

We call them chess ai. But they’re not actually real A.I. chess bots work off of opening books, predetermined best practices. And then analyzes each position and potential offshoots with an evaluation function.

They will then start to brute-force positions until it finds a path that is beneficial.

While it may sound very much alike. It works very differently than an A.I. However. It turned out that A.I software became better than humans at writing these functions.

So in a sense, chess computers are not A.I. They’re created by A.I. at least Stockfish 12 has these “A.I inspired” evaluations. (Currently they’re on Stockfish 15 I believe)

And yes. We also did make “chess AI” that is as bad as the average player. We even made some that are worse. Because we figured it would be nice if people can play a chess computer that is on the same skill level as the player. Rather than just being destroyed every time.