I know way back in the day before any of the cloud stuff, the free trial system used to raw write to an unused area of the filesystem structure near the beginning of the drive in order to mark down unremovable details about the trial so you couldn’t just free trial over and over and over.
So I wouldn’t put it past them to have a similar fingerprint written somewhere otherwise inaccessible.
When I think of an automated system that can protect itself, ED-209 comes to mind for some reason.
Your writing is a pleasure to read. Thanks for this.
Oh my God, I just checked and me too.
IMO Canadians should examine the war in Ukraine to get an idea about how to prepare, but keep in mind Russia’s relative military ineptitude.
When things get dire, the fast and high bandwidth Internet we know will be gone, but a form of slow, intermittent Internet will probably be around; still technically an Internet.
Oh, so that’s why Google is killing sideloading.
Then again, I could have accomplished the same thing by knocking off work for the day and going to the driving range.
Hey, look at the bright side, as long as you were chained to your desk instead, that’s all that matters.
uninformed for skeptical
Perhaps one begets the other.
The article is not fishy, you are just uninformed. They are powering the datacenter with turbines fueled by natural gas. You are right about the datacenter though, it’s beyond fishy, into crime territory. To top it all off, they have approval to run only a handful of turbines (after not even seeking approval in the first place, i.e. running them illegally), but they are running a ton of them.
*looks around* That’s a pretty big if.
I feel there’s a certain sad irony about the domain on that link.
I am having flashbacks to the scene in Idiocracy where the doctor is talking about his wife.
Autopilot hasn’t received any updates for years.
Like I said, demonstrates neglect.
If Kleenex were the only ones doing facial tissue, then this could be, “toilet paper vs. Kleenex”, and you’d be wondering “why isn’t this Charmin vs Kleenex?” while Charmin happened to be the TP brand they chose because they had access to it.
Tesla is the only one doing camera-only self driving, so there’s no point in delineating the two. Lidar you can expect from any other brand, so it’s a token choice in this instance, especially for an engineering entertainment video.
Autopilot is just adaptive cruise control that keeps the car in lane.
Anyone who watches the video in question knows this statement is misleading. Autopilot also stops when it detects an obstacle in the way (well, it’s supposed to, but the video demonstrates otherwise). Furthermore, decades old adaptive cruise from other brands will stop too because even they have classic radar or laser range-finding.
If even the most basic go no-go + steer operation based on computer vision can’t detect and stop before obstacles, why trust an even more complicated solution? If they don’t back-port some apparent detection upgrade from fsd to the basic case, that demonstrates even further neglect anyway.
The whole point that everyone is dancing around is that Tesla gambled that cheaping out by using only cameras would be fine, but it cannot even match decades-old technology for the basic case.
Did they test it against decades old adaptive cruise? No, that’s been solved, but they did test it against that technology’s next generation, and it ran circles around vision not backed by a human brain.
We build our own prisons.
Sorry you are getting downvoted for being one of today’s 10,000
That’s great, thanks! I really appreciate the detailed response and the links.
The methodology IS cloud native
Ok great. Is it also fair to say that cloud native is the methodology? Or is cloud native a higher order concept that the methodology can fall into? I.e. rock is music, but music is not rock.
As someone who read Biological War: A Scenario last week… ah geez.