![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/105f5866-fda1-46a7-9db1-df83a71225c8.jpeg)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
The Solar system has vast secrets and riches, all for us, and we don’t have to share, because it’s our system.
That is until we find the massive moon worms whose tunnels we tried to colonize. /s
The Solar system has vast secrets and riches, all for us, and we don’t have to share, because it’s our system.
That is until we find the massive moon worms whose tunnels we tried to colonize. /s
Zionists are not following Judaism. If you ask jewish people living in occupied Palestine
A majority of Jews in the U.S. and globally also support the existence of Israel.
Okay but again as has been pointed out to you, that has no bearing on government contracted products like this, whether that’s code or rockets or anything else the government doesn’t want to just share with the entire world.
Why do you think software would be treated any differently?
Okay but that has no relevance at all to what the comment you were replying to was about. Companies contracted by the government and DOD specifically to create rockets are guaranteed to be covered by ITAR. Meaning open sourcing them would be impossible, regardless of the first amendment or anything else.
There’s a massive massive difference between the software for a DOD contracted rocket like SpaceX makes, and hobbyist rocketry.
While courts have ruled source code is first amendment protected. Your statement is still very very wrong. Just because it’s first amendment protected doesn’t mean it can’t be classified normally or made illegal to leak because of ITAR.
But go leak some of the source code from XKeyscore or a schematic of a pair of GPNVG if you’d like to test our code classification and ITAR systems.
Liquid breathing is definitely possible, you’ve even done it before (in the womb), but it’s probably not possible with something like blood. I think your friend was probably mixing up two different concepts