𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚒𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝙼𝚎𝚘𝚠

Unlikely, Europe would sooner buy more lng from the US than from Russia. And Russia’s drone supplier is likely not supplying much anymore, especially after Iran saw that Russia’s response to the US attacking is basically nothing. Putin is almost certainly very unhappy about this.

Doubtful. Librewolf still uses Firefox as base.

Not sure if he quit or was fired, but he updated his employment status with FUTO on LinkedIn.

Rossman doesn’t work for FUTO anymore. FUTO has done some weird shit and Rossman has made some missteps in the past, but at least for him his heart seems to be in the right place. I don’t think it’s in his nature to want to screw you over so to speak.

These attacks can happen through server impersonation as well. The actual cloud servers need not be compromised, just the user’s browser has to be. This attack can then leak passwords and allow malicious parties to even gain access on the actual cloud servers apparently.

IIRC they found that even with balanced training data facial recognition models just do worse on darker-skinned people. Something about cameras picking up less contrast on the skin, meaning there are fewer easily-identifiable facial features it can pick up from an image.

So you were arguing a hypothetical point that hasn’t actually happened. I’m not sure what the point of that is, you’re essentially shoehorning people in a position that you believe they might take, despite them not actually having done so (and possibly wouldn’t take in the first place).

Word of advice: don’t. People tend to not respond well to what is essentially a strawman argument. Don’t focus on hypotheticals but on what has actually happened and what people are actually arguing in favour of. Otherwise you’re having an imaginary discussion with imaginary people.

So either the rules hold, and the seizing was legitimate, or they don’t hold anymore, meaning it doesn’t matter it was seized?

What were you arguing again?

Both Hamas and Israel seem to agree it is a war? Hamas stated goal was to create a “permanent state of war” with Israel, and Netanyahu announced that Israel was at war as well. You think they’re only pretending or something?

I’m not sure what the point of denying that it is a war is? It doesn’t undercut the genocide perpetrated by Israel in any way, nor does it justify it. Perhaps you could explain this as I’m not following.

It can be both.

Wouldn’t follow up or ask hard questions about combined metrics. It’s in their best interest to be enthusiastic about the numbers and push them to less critical media outlets everywhere, so the share price goes up.

Sure, but a nuclear program is kinda hard to hide. Even spy sattelites will likely spot the signs, and good luck blocking those.

You can’t fully verify it, but Claude is somewhat chatty. It’ll output its whole “thought process”, which can be reviewed. I recently had Claude write some C# analyzers for me, which I don’t quite know how to write from scratch. I can easily review its reasoning and correct it if it makes a mistake. It’ll say something like “Oh, I need to change X or Y” and you can then tell it it’s an idiot and correct it.

It’s by no means perfect and it does need a good reviewer though. I’ve seen it just “give up” fixing a test, subsequently deleting the test entirely. If you’re a good code reviewer, you can probably fairly effectively use these tools.

Espionage.

I’d rather have the war stop though.

I just explained that the shareholders wouldn’t do that, because that only risks the shareprice going down, which is against their interests.

At a shareholders meeting/end of year report/etc… Does matter as long as it goes public.

Because Microsoft presented numbers that chuds think sound good, so they will want to buy their shares, pushing the share price up. The people who own shares but know the numbers are fud will shut up because idiots are buying their shares at a premium. The people without shares who know better won’t buy shares, which doesn’t affect the price, and Microsoft just replies nothing to their questions.

Depending on the specific flavour of Android, afaik. Not generally.

Pahlavi himself iirc never ruled and criticised his father who did, so not sure how correctly he can be characterized as an “autocrat”. He might well be genuine. But yes, it’s obvious that there’s foreign countries who’d much prefer him over the theocracy.