The numbers are pretty much a consensus among researchers. If you disagree, then the burden is on YOU to do a deep, critical analysis. I’m just reporting the conclusions of others, not doing any critical analysis. If those conclusions make you feel uncomfortable, maybe you should explore that feeling more. Although if you want to do a critical analysis, I’d welcome it.

Well, you’re really just throwing out what-ifs. But you happened to chance on one theory that some researchers think could partially explain the discrepancy:

Being bi or lesbian still comes together with a special type of discrimination that a straight woman most likely will never experience;

Being oppressed causes stress, stress causes lack of control. The idea is it’s a similar driver to why poorer couples have higher rates of abuse.

That’s probably not the SOLE cause, but it’s likely a factor.

Just because someone was victimized doesn’t mean every thing they do afterwards is a smart idea. It’s a fundamentally flawed approach and her being a victim doesn’t change that.

There’s 4 billion men on the planet. If you want to find men with 3 arms, you’ll find a lot of them.

Woman who goes looking for shitty men found shitty men! More at 11

Post the screenshot

You’d be banned faster than trying to say “Tiananmen” on grad

If you happened to go in there and speak against them, you’d just be banned and have your post removed.

Statistically, lesbian relationships are far more likely to be abusive than hetero ones.

https://www.standffov.org/tdvam/abuse-in-lesbian-relationships/

Not so fun fact: lesbian relationships are statistically far more likely to be abusive than hetero relationships

More salient takeaway is, don’t use a LLM to translate a scientific paper. Because it can’t translate a scientific paper. It can only rewrite the entire paper, in a different language. And it will introduce misunderstandings and hallucinations.

Literally EVERY SINGLE TIME a news article mentions both “porn” and “children”, it turns out it’s some bullshit being pushed by a Christian fundamentalist group, and often with an added dose of state surveillance and restricting liberty. Add in “terrorists”? Don’t even bother with this article, it’s pure hysteria propaganda. It’s like a WASPy suburban mom’s wet dream.

wasting more money on more contractors and giving them more of our data to store

…is the point.

There’s a nomzero chance we’re already in that part. Has anyone actually heard from any of the people sent to the El Salvador prison?

Any time you find yourself using the phrase “show me proof”, it’s a good idea to briefly take a step back and consider whether you’re being a moron.

The randomness is the point. He wants the markets to yo-yo so those with insider knowledge can make a bunch of money.

Expect this to continue until Trump gets bored of it.

Doesn’t change the fact that FUCK THAT

I don’t care why he did it, and neither should you. What a ridiculous purity test.

Fifty. MILLION.

The man should literally be made into a saint. “Oooh Linux blah blah” FIFTY FUCKING MILLION LIVES SAVED. The man has far outweighed anything bad he’s ever done in his life.

Oh no, not that horrible person Bill Gates who checks notes saved 50 million peoples lives