I’m betting you are under the assumption that I am defending Russia. Being critical of bullshit lies from US propaganda is not an endorsement of the other side.

When the source is known for nothing but propaganda, it should be regarded as questionable.

Sounds like money laundering to me.

It could be in there a dozen times and it doesn’t make it true. They’ve lied to us continually and have a history of lying over decades to manufacture public consent for war.

Victims of US propaganda always view themselves as immune to propaganda. But feel free to continue believing the comforting lies you are told.

The BBC article doesn’t make the false claim of Russia burning off their faces to keep it a secret.

Point where it says Russia is burning off their faces to keep it a secret

Trying to conflate the USSR and Russia is infantile

Something about a broken clock?

It’s not a matter of disagreeing with it, the sole purpose of RFA and RFE is propaganda

Lemmy.world ironically talking about echo chambers?

And you would be wrong, Newsweek is owned by right wing Christian fundamentalists and RFA is CIA propaganda

That you’re trying to claim that I’ve said things that I did not. I’m saying that radio free Asia is CIA propaganda that puts a western slant on their propaganda.

Does it make you uncomfortable to hear information that you disagree with despite it being true?

Also trash

I’m sure that the CIA backed Radio Free Asia doesn’t have a US bias slant

If you voted for a democrat or republican you did vote for this

New US weapons must have dropped

Democrats and Republicans in general vote for whoever is on their ticket, regardless of their past, Harris and Trump are prime examples. So yes, people mostly vote on ideology, not

You don’t vote for ideologies

The VBNMW crowd says different

I’m not complaining, the job is only half done