![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
Luxury goods have been a growing market alongside the wealth divide.
Luxury goods have been a growing market alongside the wealth divide.
The liability for a product that tightens around a neck would make it an untouchable concept for businesses. I could imagine a dystopian future where some big brand like Dickies selling it and when it kills people they claim the fine print very clearly disallows any shirts except for patented self-tying tie constrained collar shirts.
One could argue that the USSR as a dictatorship is not much different than modern Russia as a dictatorship, and that claims of communism contradict the reality of the Stalin era, but there are certainly a lot of nuance that I’m avoiding with such a statement.
Omg, the RSSU, lmao. How is this not the Onion?
I don’t like apple but due to the heavy nuance of this situation I approve of this action. It would have been better for them to develop and distribute their own methods of secure authentication but I realize a for profit company would never agree to that.
You might be able to get through the story and a couple of maps pretty easily without a guide, later acts will be difficult if you specced really wrong, but if you want to run endgame content and league mechanics while on a hardcore solo self founded character then you better go get fucking gud, mate.
Was the original a joke about MMO learning curves with the top line being Path of Exile?
You have to start over and throw out the old laws.
You should work on your shit ideology and core values, or if you meant something other than what you explicitly said then you should work on your English writing capability.
It’s imbalanced, I never said otherwise, but not having it would suck more.
You have to start over and throw out the old laws.
You, then.
Okay but you can literally just overwrite laws without making a period inbetween where anything and everything is allowed. That’s fucking stupid.
With a good case a lot of lawyers would be willing to work pro bono, especially when it’s an individual infringed by a corporation who have plenty to take from.
For example, the script for the movie The Purge was stolen from an individual in 2012, and after 4 years of litigation Universal paid out a massive settlement in 2018 and also ended the series despite its success.
Throwing them out and restarting is a lot harder than restarting without throwing them out.
As much as Copyright=Capitalism, yeah.
Anarchy by definition is:
Absence of any form of political authority.
Political disorder and confusion.
Absence of any cohesive principle, such as a common standard or purpose.
Literally what that word has meant for generations, etymology stemming from middle French “Anarchie” in 16th century.
Pretty sure that’s a basic function of a publicly operated archive, but for sure there was a lot of nuance.
If by “claim” you mean falsify authorship, I suspect this would still be illegal even without all the copyright laws.
You would be wrong, in the USA at least.
I like having the options to sue in a court of law to enforce these rights a lot more than not having rights at all.
For sure, but a large many modern problems which result in fatalities daily are not hard engineering problems to solve.