LOL. Smaller battery, too. What exactly is an upgrade from the previous version? They went from a SD 7+ Gen 3 to an 8s Gen 3, which is barely an upgrade at all.
I’m sure the price comparisons will vary based on country, but I’ve seen the OnePlus 13R below $500 pretty routinely on oneplus.com this year. Right now it’s $550 but if I remember right, it was cheaper at launch and a few times since.
I was about to say this.
If they can’t give me a callback number that is publicly listed on their web site, then they’re most likely a scammer.
With Google, however, this is a scarier proposition than with most companies. If someone from my phone company, or my bank, or my insurance company called me, I could very easily call the actual company and talk to a human to confirm. I have no idea how I could ever talk to a human at Google. I’m not sure they even have a public phone line.
And malicious actors all over the world. Don’t forget that they are also sharing exploits with malicious actors all over the world, several months before deploying fixes for those exploits.
What could possibly go wrong?!
Unfortunately, you still need a level of trust with Proton. Even aside from trusting that they will not bend to pressure to terminate your service, you’re also trusting them with your network of contacts, because metadata (including the sender, recipient, and subject line) are not end-to-end encrypted in Proton.
Just wear disposable faces.
You humans wear the same face your entire life and then get upset when people recognize it?! Get over yourself! Aside from the obvious privacy issue, let’s be real: it’s also gross.
I don’t think you even can deny apps network permission on most Android builds anymore. Didn’t Google kill that option years ago for the sake of ads? (I’m on GrapheneOS now, where it certainly is possible, but if I remember right I couldn’t do it on the stock Pixel OS.)
Interesting! Those Lemmy links are not explicitly added by the Lemmy users. Looks like that’s just how Mastodon displays it, with a link back to the original source. I guess it’s a quirk, and Mastodon does it to ensure that information is not lost when pulling in posts from different ecosystems. But in this case it seems unnecessary.
I think it’s the opposite. It takes work to implement restrictions. And they they’re presumably going to need ongoing work to patch workarounds. The restrictions would be on top of the standard functionality. They can’t remove or simplify anything by restricting app installations.
So Branch reneged on their agreement? Super scummy.
I’ve been using Lawnchair ever since the buyout was announced. It’s a downgrade from Nova tbh but it’s good enough.
That can’t be good. But I guess it was inevitable. It never seemed like Arc had a sustainable business model.
It was obvious from the get-go that their ChatGPT integration was a money pit that would eventually need to be monetized, and…I just don’t see end users paying money for it. They’ve been giving it away for free hoping to get people hooked, I guess, but I know what the ChatGPT API costs and it’s never going to be viable. If they built a local-only backend then maybe. I mean, at least then they wouldn’t have costs that scale with usage.
For Atlassian, though? Maybe. Their enterprise customers are already paying out the nose. Usage-based pricing is a much easier sell. And they’re entrenched deeply enough to enshittify successfully.
Better yet, use borg to back up. Managing your own tars is a burden. Borg does duduplication, encryption, compression, and incrementals. It’s as easy to use as rsync but it’s a proper backup tool, rather than a syncing tool.
Not the only option, but it’s open source, and a lot of hosts support it directly. Also works great for local backups to external media. Check out Vorta if you want a GUI.
Why? It’s Japanese and your browser should display it as マリウス. But I don’t know what that means.
Yeah, that’s true for a subset of code. But for others, the hardest parts happen in the brain, not in the files. Writing readable code is very very important, especially when you are working with larger teams. Lots of people cut corners here and elsewhere in coding, though. Including, like, every startup I’ve ever seen.
There’s a lot of gruntwork in coding, and LLMs are very good at the gruntwork. But coding is also an art and a science and they’re not good at that at high levels (same with visual art and “real” science; think of the code equivalent of seven deformed fingers).
I don’t mean to hand-wave the problems away. I know that people are going to push the limits far beyond reason, and I know it’s going to lead to monumental fuckups. I know that because it’s been true for my entire career.
If I’m verifying anyway, why am I using the LLM?
Validating output should be much easier than generating it yourself. P≠NP.
This is especially true in contexts where the LLM provides citations. If the AI is good, then all you need to do is check the citations. (Most AI tools are shit, though; avoid any that can’t provide good, accurate citations when applicable.)
Consider that all scientific papers go through peer review, and any decent-sized org will have regular code reviews as well.
From the perspective of a senior software engineer, validating code that could very well be ruinously bad is nothing new. Validation and testing is required whether it was written by an LLM or some dude who spent two weeks at a coding “boot camp”.
For the immediate future, I’ll be all set with GrapheneOS.
Beyond that, I’ll suffer whatever inconveniences I need to in order to avoid this bullshit. If that means I can’t use my banking apps, I’ll find a better bank, or use the web site, or just say “fuck it all” and stop banking on my phone altogether. I’ve already given up NFC payments. It’s not the end of the world.
This will only become a bigger pain in the ass as time goes on, I’m sure, but I will die on this hill. I suggest that everyone draw their lines in the sand sooner rather than later.
Well then let’s flip that right around then: if “most people” never do it, why the fuck should they spend the energy to ban it?
The difference between “average person” and “most people” is beside the point. It doesn’t really matter if we’re talking about 1 standard deviation from median or 3. Edge cases matter. Outliers matter. Choice matters. People matter.
USB attacks with things like Celebrite are within scope of GrapheneOS’s security model.
In theory Seedvault covers this. In practice…well I dunno, ask me again when I get my next phone. I’ve not had the opportunity to properly test it.
No average person
I hate this line of reasoning in all facets of life. And it does seem to appear in all facets of life.
Nobody is average in every way. If we accept that it’s okay for every goddam thing to suit only the “average”, and to hell with everyone else, then nobody will happy in more than ~3-5 aspects of their life.
Induction stoves are the new hotness (literally and figuratively). Is that what you’ve used, or did you have the older (and much worse) type with glowing heating coils?
I thought electric stoves were all bullshit until I learned that “induction stove” was not just another term for what I was used to. But I’ve never seen one outside of fairly recent, relatively expensive renovations.