Not a problem I’ve ever faced before, admittedly
On my redemption playthrough (send help)
Not a problem I’ve ever faced before, admittedly
Well hell, it’s not like it’s your money.
That’s honestly intense. I would be terrified of having that much data in one place
Anyone who wants the internet to be like this… It’s hard to describe adequately.
The idea makes me as angry as I was when I was a kid and first heard about the destruction of the library of Alexandria. It is a deep dark rage.
We still lack a general theory of neural activity, while mountains of data continue to accumulate. I hope we get closer with his effort.
And there it is
Unironically how I live my life
Get yourself one too
We need to make it simpler and connect the dots. Like, what’s the worst that could happen when billionaires have exclusive control over a for-profit infinite gaslighting machine? This needs to be spelled out.
…sounds like a DraStic solution
An “avalanche” of… Videos with 6 second segments of weird B roll. Okay scary headline, I see you.
All good here 👍💥
I wasn’t trying to downplay. If it can be wielded thoughtfully at scale, it could be life changing for literally millions.
The risk is that billionaires own these models, and far too often we see their interests aligned with fascism. If they choose to place a motive in this box, they now know it will have a quantifiable effect.
Let me guess, the good news is that conspiracism can be cured but the bad news is that LLMs are able to shape human beliefs. I’ll go read now and edit if I was pleasantly incorrect.
Edit: They didn’t test the model’s ability to inculcate new conspiracies, obviously that’d be a fun day at the office for the ethics review board. But I bet with a malign LLM it’s very possible.
M-DISC, at a guess. The media would last long enough at least for grandkids, who will have bigger things to worry about.
Putting Mint on an old iMac soon actually. Been a while since I got to use Linux.
For once I’m #1 in something 🥳
I admit I was only thinking about the output of our largest firms. There’s room for that, and I could easily be persuaded that the strength and duration of IP law should be inversely proportional to the size of the IP holder itself. And especially whether it is held by the sole creator, or collectively by private interests. People should own what they personally made, as much as possible under the circumstances.
I’m slightly surprised that loss of faith in corporations being good stewards of our cultural content - wantonly deleting cherished shows, namely - has not driven a larger move towards personal ownership of media. In a world where anything that fails to be profitable faces destruction, owning your stuff has never been a better idea.