For current Americans, future Americans, current humans or future humans?

And I thought social media was the worse things we did to kids…

Huh, I wonder how enshitified it has to get before I stop seeing discord on FOSS projects.

It begins lol.

Da fuck is your resolution?

this is just wrong no matter how much you blabber to support it" kind of solutions.

When you put it like that, I might be a perfect fit in today’s world with the loudest voice wins landscape.

I agree with you but not for the reason you think.

I think the golden age of ML is right around the corner, but it won’t be AGI.

It would be image recognition and video upscaling, you know, the boring stuff that is not game changing but possibly useful.

Is it really a grift when you are selling possible value to an investor who would make money from possible value?

As in, there is no lie, investors know it’s a gamble and are just looking for the gamble that everyone else bets on, not that it l would provide real value.

What’s funny is that we already have general intelligence in billions of brains. What tech bros want is a general intelligence slave.

AI is shit but imo we have been making amazing progress in computing power, just that we can’t really innovate atm, just more race to the bottom.

——

I thought capitalism bred innovation, did tech bros lied?

/s

Yeah, now we are gonna get the reality of deep fakes; fun times.

If that’s the reason, I wouldn’t even be mad, that’s recycling right there.

Imo we should give credit where credit is due and I agree, not a genius, still my pick is a 4080 for a new gaming computer.

Imo it’s on me to either read the article or be okay with not being informed. Don’t get me wrong, a summery is good, but not when it’s not reliable and the article is a click away, some might have a different comfort level.

No summery is better than a bad summery, it would encourage you to actually read the source.

That’s not what I’m implying. What I’m saying is that wasting time and effort on quality is pointless when the threshold for success is low.

Yes and my response to that is for some people maybe, for others they don’t want a low threshold, they want few good articles instead of spam of low quality.

Maybe in other words, engineering tolerances apply to LLMs too. They’re crude devices, but it’s totally fine if you have a crude problem.

Exactly, I’m saying there is no objective crude problem. You might be okay with simple summaries but I want every single piece of information I consume to have a very high bar.

That’s my point, from my perspective, there was no switch. Using a one year old model is fine.

My comment was about how people looking at the same thing, one might think it’s a bait and switch while the other one always knew the second item was being implied.

The headline never said all AI or latest AI.

Lemmy users try not to make a strawman argument (impossible challenge)

This was not a strawman. Please don’t assume lemmy users make logical fallacies when it’s only you who thinks that.

I mean, what you’re essentially implying is, what if we could do a lot of things that we do today, but faster and less quality.

Imo we have too much things today and very few are worth their salt, so this is the opposite of the right direction.

They want the data

Was looking into some FOSS tools, the ones that say discord I automatically skip, imo it’s not future proof.