The reason is in the post tbh

Publishers usually get about 85 to 90% of the revenue on printed books, and 75% of the revenue on ebooks.

If using copyrighted data becomes illegal, they will get 100% of the profit from selling their data most likely.

This book should be aimed at them.

Are you hoping Meta or the copyright industry wins this case? Maybe I misunderstood.

I mean a loss for meta is technically a win for everyone most of the time but I’d expect more pragmatism in this case.

None of that matter if, right now, you are cheering on copyright laws. There’s no reason to stop promoting change now.

Encouraging laws you don’t like does nothing but cement them. We are currently, as a society, begging lawmakers for harder copyright laws.

I get the Justice system sucks but making the wrong laws stronger does not make it better.

Think about what you are saying is all, you tend to write long elaborate speeches on why copyright deserves to win. There is being critical of AI, and then there’s being a mouthpiece for copyright companies. I’m not trying to be mean here, sorry.

We don’t get better laws if everyone is cheering for the copyright industry. Everything after your first point goes against that. Goliath, the same one that beat up Aaron, finally has a match in his own weight category, and you are hoping he wins basically.

It’s weird that your take away is “Meta needs to get it” and not “Clearly, these laws work for no one”. You don’t get better copyright laws by cheering for the copyright companies.

Aaron wouldn’t be part of the side that wants to lock up all data behind a giant gate and give the keys to a handful of companies. Well, we don’t know what he would think, but I’m guessing he didn’t lean copyright.

They didn’t say seeding is fair use, just inherently part of torrenting. Good thing Sarah Silverman has pc gamer there to pander for her.

The whole area has little food security and no water security. A few desalination plants have already been hit iirc. It’s going to be a huge crisis.

One explanation I heard was that it was very close to a naval base and almost all the students were kids of high ranked officers. They killed their kids to send them a message.

I can’t find the video in the article to confirm, but I also heard it was double tapped.

I’m not pro-copyright. I actually steal content, as in pirate it and then watch it. I don’t consider it stealing to do it to train AI on it tbh.

“Our” data implies we collectively own it, yet we don’t, copyright companies for the most part do.

To be fair, I did say inherently part of. It would have been rude of them not to seed.

Your definition excludes a lot of genocides, including the Holocaust, unless the SS are to be considered an unorganized group of civilians. Bosnia, Armania, Cambodia, most except Rwanda.

Of course, that would exclude Gaza as well.

I’d say who is targeted and for what purpose is more important. Targeting military installation vs purely civilian targets like refugee camps for instance.

He is talking about Gaza. Spacecowboy has colorful views that were probably instilled into him at a young age.

They are saying that seeding is inherently part of torrenting, not that it’s fair use. I mean, at least they weren’t a leech.

My stance is fuck the copyright companies and fuck Meta for everything they do except in this case, because seedings a good thing and so is Anna’s archive.

Ya, it could be better. Maybe a compromise would be to go with EEG machines which are less costly and can probably still differentiate fairly well (maybe).

It’s quite costly to run an fMRI. Not needed if you can get the same results more or less from a questionnaire.

It’s talked about because Israel’s genocide is being done with our support and our weapons, and that support is clearly because of bribes and blackmail.

That’s why I specify that everything should be verified in a later comment. My point is that LLMs when properly guided are better than other automatic translation service, while hallucination can easily be avoided with proper prompting.

Also worth mentioning that there’s massive difference in user generated translations already, some of it is well meaning while other, like in Israel’s case, isn’t.

I translate a lot of stuff for my work, and I don’t have any problems when I instruct it properly. I’m also there to verify. I don’t have to deal with hallucinations ever, mostly just changing a word or two because I don’t like how it sounds (it uses overly complex words at times).

This is more about certain users being shit and either not checking their work or doing work they have no place doing. They would exist no matter what they use, it’s not the tools fault.

Tbh, I work in research and we would never use Wikipedia for anything. We can’t quote it and anytime I find a good tidbit on it and try and find the source, I usually get dead link or just something altogether false which doesn’t represent what the user wrote. Probably highly dependent on the subject though but the sourcing isn’t very rigorous.

Bless them though, it’s an amazing site and they are still doing a stellar job considering how big it is.

Whatever is used, I think nothing is going to be 100% and everything should be verified by a native speaker. It is Wikipedia afterall, not some blog.

Non-LLM services are worse in my opinion but it probably depends on the language (LLMs probably struggle with certain languages as well).