HobbitFoot

Except that spammers can curate that set of posts and comments similar to legit users.

Recycling copper is already cheaper than mining a lot of cases.

Not exactly.

There were attempts after Mao to try to remove the threat of dictatorship from the government. The Politboro operated as a full committee until Xi consolidated power.

Even if you aren’t, the tolerance of executions is pretty high.

A country has to execute a lot of people per year to suffer some form of international consequences.

Honestly, the best country to approach this would be China, and I don’t think China would want to deal with the risk of building infrastructure.

What’s a Dutch woman going to say when you ask for her sign?

Stop.

A lot of people used to be miserable in families and relationships. Now they can be miserable alone.

So this is how they try to kick out the party this time.

Why did he lose his primary?

Not really. I’d argue the dot com bust was worse due to the quantity of websites that died because they didn’t actually have a business model.

What we’re seeing is a tech industry where all the tech is on the right side of the S curve and trying one last stab at a technology that may be on the left side.

But it isn’t about creating quality results. It is about creating good enough results where the cost of failure in AI over humans is lower than the cost of humans over AI.

This has been Silicon Valley’s MO for generations.

Because it isn’t controlled by Russia.

Probably not. If Google could survive the Amazon App Store, it doesn’t have a reason to restrict sideloading now.

I feel really bad that she’s going through this.

I’m asking if it worth spending more money on human developers to write code that isn’t slop.

Everyone here has been mentioning costs, but they haven’t been comparing them together to see if the cost of using human developers located in a high cost of living American city is worth the benefits.

Historically open source and closed source have done the same thing, so why is this one tool usage so wildly different?

Because, as noted by another replier, open source wants working code and closed source just want code that runs.

That’s basically my question. If the standards of code are different, AI slop may be acceptable in one scenario but unacceptable in another.

So I was trying to make a statement that the developers of AI for coding may not have the high bar for quality and optimization that closed source developers would have, then was told that the major market was internal business code.

So, I asked, do companies need code that runs quickly on the systems that they are installed on to perform their function. For instance, can an unqualified programmer use AI code to build an internal corporate system rather than have to pay for a more qualified programmer’s time either as an internal hire or producing.