
Most research into AI tends to split is usefulness into two categories, it helps the top performers more than the average or it helps the bottom performers more than the average.
If it helps the bottom performers more, that industry is dead since it means that AI can credibly do the job well enough to replace people. If it helps out the top performers more, it means you can run on reduced head count, but the standards for the remaining headcount are going to go up.
What is being optimized in the end? Reduced headcount. The work may be slop, but if it is good enough, it will be cheaper to implement and cost may be more of an issue that quality.




That’s implied in the use of men as a descriptor.