![](https://the.coolest.zone/media/b1/7a/b17afbf99761f1e8a0835ff12be8c7168050ac554cc1510383f7415fd7b9c0a8.png)
![](https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/pictrs/image/a18b0c69-23c9-4b2a-b8e0-3aca0172390d.png)
You’re thinking of BD-R: BD-RE can be rewritten/erased hundreds of times
I sometimes admin. But usually not.
You’re thinking of BD-R: BD-RE can be rewritten/erased hundreds of times
I’d honestly prefer raw parroting in most cases, even if it’s “obviously” wrong. I don’t want people selectively interpreting the facts as have been conveyed to them, unless they’re prepared to do a proper peer review.
Though btw, I also think it’s fascinating the difference if you look up Pyhäsalmi Mine gravitricity "2 MW"
vs Pyhäsalmi Mine gravitricity "2MW"
You’ll get different articles entirely
I googled Pyhäsalmi Mine gravitricity "2 MW"
and EVERY article covering this has also cited 2 MW.
Now, under Occam’s Razor, what’s more likely:
I don’t know which one it is. But I’d generally lean against 1.
DAE enshittification bad!!1!
go fmt has been a thing for almost 11 years
Hey, I maintain a highly popular (if niche) FOSS library. Where the fuck is my big tech paycheck where they bribe me into integrating with their product?
/s Silly take IMO, relies on cherry-picking popular FOSS projects where you can see “the influence” of big tech, AND then No True Scotsman your way into saying that they’re not allowed to participate in the development/influence of FOSS because… checks notes they’re the ones funding the project/putting money in front of otherwise unpaid volunteers?
If you end up coming up with a better scheme for things that has the actual practical effect of compensating devs appropriately (yes, that means at current market rates or better) for their work, then please let us know so we can switch to doing that immediately. I will literally do anything you suggest if it would achieve that end.
Absolutely fucking me_irl
That’s only for a single service, not really what OP seems to be asking for
From the top of this thread, Valve was suggested as a candidate for someone who might already be interested in these things, perhaps to the point of invested into each of those.
Or maybe they don’t. Maybe nobody does.
People can speculate and dream. Nobody’s speaking authoritatively here, and certainly nobody is petitioning that Linus himself get down and dirty in anti-cheat functionality.
Or here’s a revolutionary thought: let people voluntarily (and reversably) opt-in to kernel-level anti-cheats.
Part of freedom is the freedom to choose.
I hesitate to ask, but, why do you have your IP change every minute? You seem to have a very atypical usecase
It’s prefectly reasonable to say “I have that site bookmarked”.
Then go to “I should have that site bookmarked”.
“I’ll check on that one site I should have bookmarked”
Etc.
Session network binding on its own seems pretty damn basic.
I play Heroes of the Storm through Lutris.
I have a superultrawide 32:9 monitor.
In X11, I can get HotS to scale past its normal limits just like I could in windows and take up a full 5120x1440 resolution.
In Wayland, I can’t.
I will die on this hill.
I believe the linux Deb is still “unofficial”
I have the advanced plan as well, and I was recently doing my migration from gdrive; I definitely uploaded over 10 TB a day without any issue.
But seconding what others have said: is that really even an issue? Gdrive only ever allowed 750 GB a day for upload, if you remember.
If you looked at the original github link, you’ll see that it has
libadwaita
(and naturally, gtk4) as a dependency.This isn’t fragmenting anything, and
adwaita
already has good documentation. This is just another binding for another language, not a whole new implementation.