

Well, ithe correct way would be to create a new container image using your current image as the base and executing your commands, you then need to rebuild that image when the base image is updated.
Well, ithe correct way would be to create a new container image using your current image as the base and executing your commands, you then need to rebuild that image when the base image is updated.
I think you can use volumes or mounts to add signal files.
Secure Boot
The UEFI specification defines a protocol known as Secure Boot, which…
…
UEFI shell
…
Classes
…
Boot stages
…
Usage
…
Application development
And finally
Criticism
It’s not the first thing, it’s in the middle.
Use nix run/nix shell and only add to the config when you’ve used that a lot for the same command.
Then clean up the config…someday.
Shred friends
The Watt-hour (Wh) rating may not exceed 20 Wh for a lithium ion cell or 100 Wh for a lithium ion battery.
The difference between cells and batteries is that you have to have multiple lithium cells to make a battery.
Edit: this is around 25000 mAh
They also say this:
In the absence of relevant standards and until the publication of the references of the relevant harmonised standards in the Official Journal of the European Union, the transitional testing methods set out in Annex IVa, or other reliable, accurate and reproducible methods, which take into account the generally recognised state-of-the-art methods, shall be used.
So I remain hopeful.
Apparently not
the new labels is tested using the same software used by many tech reviewers: SmartViser. This French automation company works with labs and manufacturers to simulate real-world usage. So now, the battery performance you see on the label is based on consistent, lab-tested data, not just marketing claims.
Not sure how to go about marketing that in our current disposable society, though.
Ditto. The most likely solution would be EU regulations forcing longer battery life/better battery safety. Maybe the new law for replaceable batteries in smartphones could be enough, it includes a rating on charging cycles which could be the new “muh number is bigger!”
Why would they? AFAIK it’s less power density for safety gain - which is hard to market. The only way I see it happening is if we find a safer and denser storage medium or if laws force safer batteries.
All of them
Internet Explorer meme bout to be replaced by just rendered on my 8gb card
Any thoughts or recommendations?
Backup important data
And you can even export it there.
Did you upgrade to the latest bios version?
Factory reset the bios?
Check for option pins on the motherboard?
How did brazzite install with secure boot turned on?
The problem is that I want failover to work if a site goes offline, this happens quite a bit with private ISP where I live and instead of waiting for the connection to be restored my idea was that kubernetes would see the failed node and replace it.
Most data will be transfered locally (with node affinity) and only on failure would the pods spread out. The problem that remained in this was storage which is why I’m here looking for options.
Thanks for the info!
I’ll try Rook-Ceph, Ceph has been recommended quite a lot now, but my nvme drives sadly don’t have PLP. Afaict that should still work because not all nodes will face power loss at the same time.
I’d rather start with the hardware I have and upgrade as necessary, backups are always running for emergency cases and I can’t afford to replace all hard drives.
I’ll join Home Operations and see what infos I can find
Bout to overtake Windows with this one!