Tilt on an angle, tap the neck.

Yeah that would make sense with the way the cuts were so seamless.

Now You See Me. I don’t know if it was intentional by the uploader, but it was completely “out of order”. The video played fine, but all of the scenes were mixed up, so we were really confused. It happened on scene cuts though so it wasn’t totally obvious and at first we thought it was just some sort of weird editing technique because of the subject of the movie.

Mythbusters was terrible for this

I’m not in a position right now to look at the files. What language is it written in? I wonder if Bedrock was branched from this project.

On Wikipedia, 4J is credited with working on Bedrock on the main Minecraft page, but not on the Bedrock page.

Edit: actually, I see on the PS3 legacy console edition page that it says it was written in C++. However, it seems that pocket edition was the source for Bedrock. Perhaps this was a separate branch from pocket edition? I would guess the PC target already existed if that’s the case and was mostly used for testing until Bedrock came along and they made PC a full target platform.

Has the accuracy of the snapshots actually changed based on this edit? After all, if it’s factual information being presented…

Yes! Quite literally, yes. They’re supposed to be an archive of what is on other sites. It doesn’t matter if the original site was, right, wrong, complete, incomplete, accurate, inaccurate, factual, unfactual, etc. If they change things, they’re editorializing and are no longer an archive, they’re new content - which is not the purpose people use them for.

I do agree that it raises the issue of what other modifications there may be,

That’s literally the point. It doesn’t matter how much you “understand the reasoning” (though you also think it’s childish and don’t agree with the actions). You can use it if you want to, no one is stopping you. The point is Wikipedia can’t trust it as a source of archived data and has every right to ban it.

That’s inappropriate, childish, and unprofessional. It makes them untrustworthy for citations. There are better ways of handling it.

If altering snapshots for a grudge isn’t your definition of “behaving poorly” for a site archiving the state of the Internet, then you must not think they have to be an accurate source of information. If they’re not an accurate source of information, then Wikipedia has no obligation to allow them to be used in citations, and they should remove such citations.

It sounds like archive.today is behaving poorly. As far as I know, Wikipedia isn’t exactly “big money”. If you know different on either front, can you please explain. Otherwise your comments are meaningless.

It isn’t clear from the article how they knew which account was associated with the individual such that they could proactively contact the RCMP after the shooting.

You can still install the drivers, you just don’t get them through windows update. I hate when windows update touches my drivers without my permission, so this sounds like a win-win.

Did you read the article? It’s about money and risk because of the war. It isn’t some altruistic thing because they care about people’s lives.

Thanks. I’m not write sure why this whole conversation is even happening…

inane [ɪˈneɪn]

adjective

1. lacking sense or meaning; silly:

   “don’t badger people with inane questions”

Also, the original article had a perfectly fine title. It’s pretty standard when posting to keep the title of the original article you’re linking to instead of editorializing it, unless you’re specifically going to fix something and note that.

Here, let me help you: copy, paste.

Your comment was inane, which is why I gave the “no, you”.

It’s missing key information, and without that information the title doesn’t make sense, and kind of isn’t as interesting. Now read your comment as if I wrote it back to you.

Why did you change the title?

Article title is: Electric hydrofoil ferry completes record 160-mile voyage using standard fast chargers

I think a lot of it is way more racist than that.

“Old stock white Canadians, and that’s us, and we don’t have to apologize for this room being filled with white people. This used to be what Alberta was. We’re not apologizing for being ourselves… If we have control over immigration, we can control who comes here.”

• Alberta Prosperity Project CEO Mitch Sylvestre

He also said, “the replacement theory is real.” (i.e. the federal government intends to replace “white Canadians” with other races through immigration.) And he claimed Justin Trudeau said this explicitly. (I’m pretty sure he did not…)

https://edmontonjournal.com/news/local-news/anti-racism-watchdog-field-complaint-arising-from-immigration-comments-made-at-separatist-town-hall

Y’all got any more of that non-AI branded tech?