Yeah, sounds like all of their customers …

Oh boy I’d love to hear Donald J Trump’s exact thoughts on the scientific method. Every damn thing he’s has to say about it will be absolute gold.

We definitely need more Trumps alongside Margaret Thatcher … all of them would be good …

I wonder how this works for twins or dopplegangers

It’s even funnier that Iran has to go 24hrs but Israel only 12hrs after Iran has already done 12 like Israel didn’t start this current round of shit.

If the peer review are unable to differentiate between student output and AI output then they are either incompetent or they are inundated with absolute garbage. The latter also suggests the former is true.

Yeah given the quality of AI outputs they could just read the papers to spot it … you know … do their jobs? I mean there’s a few layers here for thesis review, the supervisor, the professor, the other peer reviewers. They are all supposed to review the paper and at least some of the data that led to its production.

Well that’s a much better question.

Jesus how bad are their student papers that they can’t tell whether an AI wrote one?!

Arguably we should be imposing 25% DST on digital products to counter the 25% tariff on aluminium and steel and then 10% on everything else. The US started it by imposing blanket tariffs in spite of our free trade agreement.

Trump thinks Hannibal Lecter ‘was’ a great man. So, his inability to separate fact from fiction aside, you can only assume he’s all good with serial killers, will be happy to be praised by them, and will continue to not reevaluate, or initially evaluate, anything.

Someone needs to spin up an AI that continuously generates pictures that annoy Donald Trump and posts them to all social media, it should actively learn what makes him and his supporters feel the saddest and optimise for those attributes.

I think they like the free money, the old money boys club and the chances to tell the poora whats best for them …

Australias Labor party is sits slightly progressive and slightly left of centre, the greens sits hard left/progressive, given we have more than 8 parties, 4 of which could be considered major parties with 2 of those in the left and none of the issues associated with FPTP and that electoral college nonsense I think Australia is doing alright in the scheme of things, especially compared with the US and UK.

Kind of, its a little more complicated than that, I think its probably more accurate to say they have their own issues. The UK system is pretty different from the shitshow in the US.

They also use FPTP but have no electoral college and multiple parties including 4 major parties. So while there are multiple parties, in any given electorate you really need to vote for the party you hate the least that has a chance of winning. The two parties in an electorate that have a chance of winning varies across electorates and regions. They also have the House of Lords instead of a senate with members of House mostly being appointed (for life) rather than elected.

So … its own nonsense. Still seems less shithouse than the US system.

Is anyone calling UK Labour centre-left? I would have thought theyd be sitting just inside the lower right quadrant of the political compass, they might have been centre left when Corbyn was the leader but that was a while ago and Starmer isn’t that kinda guy.

Don’t try and downplay the affect of connecting with noons on the human psyche. They are an evil scourge and should be eradicated. This is exactly the kind of thing a noon would post.

Ahh yeah, sorry, my bad

If you look at the vote compass Labor currently sits a little left and slightly progressive, they have implemented/supported their fair share of authoritarian right legislation though

What about Howard?