According to Israel they’re not totally human so it’s fine. I wish I were exaggerating but that’s their actual argument.

I think the word rape might be the spoiler tag if reading about rape might be traumatizing to you.

Sure it just wouldn’t be as valuable. The details are what was important specifically the fact that media is pulling punches on it implying the author would not be doing that.

And you somehow thought there wouldn’t be discussion about why it’s gang rape and not let’s say sexual assault?

That’s a fuckin weird take tbh.

It’s news, if it weren’t informative it wouldn’t be news.

“14 dead in house fire” clicks link “omg they’re talking about people dying in a fire! How could I have known this would happen?!”

They’ve already been named, you just don’t agree.

Also, read usernames or a better yet a book.

You mean when organ transplants generally failed? Oh I wonder why they weren’t more common.

Seriously bud.

So again, how do you feel now that Israel is demanding more than 48 people and all remains that probably don’t exist in identifiable condition given the constant bombing of all but like 5% of Gaza.

But we have such conclusive evidence they’re Venezuelan gangsters like… Being on a fast boat near Venezuela.

Uh huh, what will you say when Israel demands more than 48 people in return.

Ed: as a fun aside. How many Palestinian “prisoners” does Israel currently hold? And if you’d be so kind how many prisoners did they hold prior to Oct 7 that are not convicted combatants?

You shouldn’t have to more to prove your point.

That’s fun a fun way to agree with me boss. You shouldn’t lie though.

They probably don’t but agreeing to release something you don’t have is pretty easy. Israel is just gonna ask for random names and break the agreement when people that don’t exist aren’t found.

No you haven’t, you’ve quoted a time I used the phrase but not a single time I’ve used it “hyper literally” we both know it doesn’t exist and we both know you’ve lied so… I’ll settle on you’re a loud mouth liar. Is love for you to prove me wrong but we both know that it’s something you are wholesale incapable of doing.

Couldn’t find that quote huh?

Hard to come back from a lie huh?

Ed you already helped, you proved my point.

You haven’t even paid enough attention to keep track of your own comments let alone mine.

Nothing to say?

Not the phrase, the exact comment where it is used “hyper literally”.

I’ve explained to you that while not factually inaccurate, because you are using a phrase differently than most people, they take issue with it.

Also you yep comments ago.

Also, if we’re being hyper-literal, it is factually inaccurate. They are still trying to bring food and medical supplies. They are not only trying to raise awareness on the issue.

Similarly, I’m not using it differently, I’m saying it doesnt fucking either way, slant no slant they mean the same thing. Civil rights leaders want attention, it’s the thing they’re most known for. I’m sure no one knew mlk’s name while he was alive right? No one knew Harvey milk before he got murdered right?

Like I said, not listening though obvious lies were a weird choice.

Where exactly am I relying on a “hyper-literal” usage of the phrase? I’d like a direct quote if possible.

It’s not factually inaccurate, she wants the attention it’s just not a negative. “She wants to be known for bringing attention to just causes and generally being empathetic” is only an insult if you’re incapable of empathy in which case who actually cares what they think.

Again, I don’t think you’re listening and at this point you’re too invested in your odd belief.

Similarly, yes or no. It was a simple question your avoiding because it would destroy your point.

Not listening well enough to answer a yes or no question it seems.

Alright, then define exactly what you’re taking issue with me about and let’s get to it.

You’re not listening.

Is all attention seeking behavior negative? Yes or no.