MolochAlter

From experience, LLM code is usually overly reliant on frameworks, because most modern code is, so you’ll get a lot of bloat if you don’t wrangle it in a different direction.

I was literally sitting at a table with my only other friend who ordered one when the mail got sent, she got in and I didn’t.

Salty, to say the least.

Less than the index once you account for inflation.

The index would cost 1300$ in today’s money, give or take.

Is it possible to point to a container folder to import from instead of uploading from the interface? I already have all my files in a folder structure on the server i’m running pdfding from.

It seems quite good, would be very nice not to need to upload every file a second time.

I do when I effortpost, or when I write docs for colleagues I like.

Ah, yeah, Radarr is a library-first kind of deal. You are supposed to add to it and then find the files.

As someone else mentioned you can add collections, there is probably one for your specific interests. If not you do need to do it manually, or you have to manually copy the files then import an existing library and manually match them there.

Click the little man shaped icon to the right of the download bar. That allows you to import files manually from that torrent.

Sounds like some shepherd reference could be good, since it’s herding the agents.

They meant artistic quality, not resolution and bitrate.

I have 2 instances of jellyfin. One is my regular home streaming, the other contains 32000 legally downloaded porn scenes (originally ~6TB, converted to x265 down to about 1.2).

It’s great to have to spice up the foreplay every now and then.

Hey, nothing to be sorry about, you’re doing this for free and were quick to fix the issue too. Thanks, I’ll give this a spin!

You should probably add a section on how to remap the ports if need be, port 3000 is pretty common and unlikely to be free on most setups that run more than a handful of containers.

I for sure am not figuring it out since I seem to be stuck in a loop where Jellyfin correctly replies to the login request (at least if its logs are to be believed) and then cliparr boots me back to the source selection screen.

ETA: the issue seems to be with using HTTP instead of HTTPS, quite annoying not to get any error messages to that effect, even though they can be found in the browser console.

Tbf, of all consoles, PlayStation games are the easiest to actually dump legally owned copies of, all you need is a bluray reader and you can do all of them.

Same, and I’d count that as contrarian behaviour.

This is a site populated mostly by the too edgy or too contrarian for Reddit, with the same flaws in incentive systems as Reddit, why are you surprised lol.

ignoring the issue with Lutris and AI for a minute

Please by all means, I ignored it in the first place, I find this way more interesting.

If you choose not to judge your own actions by the expected consequences of those actions for everyone involved, then how exactly are you supposed to judge them?

Well, this is only half the problem. It’s a bad system because it demands the impossible of you (i.e. accurately predict the future) but it also has a really narrow interest in the dimensions of human morality.

To directly answer the question however: you judge them by a set of principles, whichever you deem right, that you apply consistently across choices.

When it comes to inter-personal choices, the vast majority of all questions can easily be answered by asking yourself “am i betraying some explicit or implicit bond of trust with someone (who has not done so themselves) by doing/saying this?” and if you are, you just stop.

And to be clear, I don’t claim to follow this principle 100% of the time, I am not a saint, but that to me is the guiding principle when there are stakes to my behaviour, and it has not failed me yet.

If you’re following some rule that disagrees with the utilitarian view, then by definition it’s a rule that in your own opinion leads to a worse outcome for everyone.

(Emphasis added)

At its core, the idea of utilitarian morality is to “maximise utility”, that is to do whatever does the most “good” to the highest number of people.

This is, IMO, a terrible metric, and as a deontologist I am perfectly happy reaching a “worse” outcome by it.

It is not particularly hard to see how, by applying this metric, you can justify any kind of scapegoating, abuse, and/or undue leniency on people that would deserve harsh punishment in any deontological or virtue based system, as soon as enough “good” is produced through it.

There is a very dark, but apt, joke about this kind of approach to morality: that 9/10 people involved in it endorse gang rape.

To me, morality is a qualitative assessment, not a quantitative one.

It does not matter how many perpetrator lives will be ruined if they have earned their punishment, and it does not matter how much happier they would be to get away with the crime than the victim would suffer, comparatively.

To do anything else would be to relinquish morality to the whims of the masses, because it implies that there is a threshold past which the abuse of the few becomes negligible due to the benefits it brings to the many.

trying to claim that all utilitarians are either stupid or evil is just incorrect.

To be fair I also stated they can be naïve; I was one too in my youth, until I learned and understood better.

Utilitarianism really falls at the first hurdle of any kind of evaluation of a moral system.

It has no real prescriptive power because it demands you be able to correctly foresee the outcome of your actions, something literally addressed by “The road to hell is paved with good intentions”, an adage of at least 400 years ago, and yet people will still gravitate towards it as if society did not explicitly caution us about that mindset forever now.

At this point I can’t help but look down on those who genuinely identify as utilitarian as either too young, too stupid, or actively malevolent and trying to find a way to justify their bad behaviours as errors rather than malice or negligence.

Personally I prefer my software to give me options, I hate when stuff like this is picked for me when equally valid options exist

No? Https is just the connection protocol? You can do it over LAN only just fine?

The joysticks are fine, nice that they’re upgrading them. I want the d-pad to be clicky though. There are kits for the deck but I don’t care enough about this to mess with the electronics, I’d rather it be done by pros.