Well sure, but I was commenting about the downsides
KulliRaivo
Well sure, but I was commenting about the downsides
It’s because of what ctrl+c does in most terminals
I guess a downside is having to fiddle with it, allowing stuff you want to get through. Sometimes it blocks stuff you don’t want blocked
Not having read anything else, I'm guessing ads
it’s pretty easy to type long commands with little typing
Big if true
I wonder if you can be a madlad and symlink your bash-aliases to a synced file.
You couldn’t even work if you made a few longer commonly used commands convenient aliases? Well alright.
I can’t imagine how you feel about bash scripts lol.
The article answers your question
It was his fault too imo
I didn’t kinda leave it out, I just left it out
Distro packagers solve the issue for the user. And it takes a lot of work
Users who want to have software accessible
“You shouldn’t use this window manager because their community is toxic”
“I’m not going to interact with the community”
Seems fair enough
It wasn’t really my fault – I was a product of my environment
Riiight.
I think it’s a great and necessary security feature. The fact that we haven’t had proper sandboxing until very recently seems strange now.
“Sir please restart your computer and do sfc /scannow please”
“I already said that I’ve restarted the computer and I’m not using Windows.”
“Okay sir please open Windows Update”
“???”
I’m wondering the same.
I much prefer the name of another filesystem, “butterface”
KDE and GNOME want to be full suites of software that offer a coherent look and whatnot.
This release KDE has actually focused on improving and fixing more than just adding features