I don’t think the screen overlay permission gives access for screen capture

I was wrong. but this article seems to imply that it’s screen overlay permission is what is needed for this to work.

“tried” why, do you think they failed?

screen capture is an entirely different thing though, and that was not available without permissions for a very long time

Because Windows updates take long and cause downtime. Also forcing reboots is not great (though I dont know if they just do that if there was a real vulnerability, that would be fine)

and also the fear that whatever will break. I often hear that people are afraid of temporarily broken drivers, but also windows updates often reset (unknown!) settings, things like audio device IDs that matter for pro audio software and systemwide audio effects (think device specific EQ and filters).

but on linux the system updates your software too, which is then again, if you are doing something professionally on the system, you are almost guaranteed from time to time to come across bugs that are in the way

But I guess Windows updates are more stable than typical Linux updates, more tests etc.

It’s weird because it’s true even though the filesystem and updates are much better organised on Linux. I mean the weird part being that windows is that stable even with the chaos it does in its system files.

from what OP said I think the sites’ DRM blocks watching on linux. I mean, why wouldn’t they try the website?

And also, are you too lazy to update your system occasionally, which is a simple command or a few clicks? Because how is needing to click a few buttons every few weeks/months “bad UX”?

It’s not the point whether they do. the average people wouldn’t. that’s why it needs to be automatic, or why the easiest way should also do that.

What? Linux mint is based on Ubuntu because that is supposed to be the great distro.

mint is supposed to undo shit decisions of ubuntu

LMDE was reported to work way less well than regular Mint. But for sure that is a good path onwards.

I don’t get it either, LMDE is treated as a testing project by mint

Distros apply updates, and users should not need to press buttons and wait all the time.

distros should let the user be able to defer updates, but make them effortless to install. people complain about forced windows updates all the time and for good reasons.

did you see how kde plasma 6 does it nowadays? its on the shutdown button. that is the way.

There’s a “Cinnamon on Wayland (Experimental)” session for that. And also, installing a new DE.

why would you recommend an experimental DE to a newbie? it breaks in 2 weeks and all you hear is “linux from shit”. not even directly, but through a friend of a friend, because they won’t ask for your help again.

when I was looking at the viability of installing mint for common people, one of my criteria was to have kde plasma, because it’s user friendly and evolves relatively quickly, in a good way. a common theme I was reading that yeah it is possible to install it manually, but it’s less stable. I think I cannot afford the burden of taking upon the yech support for people and fixing an unsupported DE when it breaks, because it is complex software, with many moving parts that if the distro does not focus on always packaging correctly, if they don’t test it but only rely on users to report issues, then that won’t work reliably. If I want kde, I need a distro that takes it seriously and allows it as a default DE.

opensuse is ending slowroll. I had a pretty good experience with fedora kde edition though

I don’t think the average consumer knows about those issues. what makes you think they do?

its here:

• https://get.opensuse.org/leap/16.0/#download
• click release notes
• release notes HTML
• 2.2 migration from leap 15.6

and SmartTubeNext and YouTube with Sponsorblock both give me about a minute of black screen

I just read somewhere that it’s because clients need to wait until the pre-roll ad ends. until that the servers will block requests to the actual video for your client

well, cannot say that masses are running from fucking 11 to linux :/

Technically, this would allow the identification of malware providers in Google’s app store.

play store publishers are already needed to submit (and publish) their name and address. they made it a requirement ~5 years ago.

certified android devices are those you can get in most stores. the play store is important for many people, ajd many apps don’t work correctly without the google mobile services components, and device makers can only legally install these on their phones if they certify their device. the certification process requires an array of quality controls and restrictions.

How can they enforce this for apps not on the play store?

certified devices will need to integrate an app verifier that will check if an app has been approved by google. the public AOSP project is said to also get this, but anyone basing on it can rip it out or modify it to their advantage. but certified device makers don’t have a choice thn to include this restriction.

Like if I write my own APK will my phone just refuse to run it if I don’t go through some paperwork with Google?

what we know so far, apps you made can be installed through a development tool. but app store aps like fdroid don’t have access to this tool, it’s difficult to enable, and somewhat risky too

Oh my god this person

oh my god! calm down, maybe look at who other people agree with more in this thread.

If google completely closed up Android

that’s not possible, because the source code is already publicly available. they can not delete it from the hard drives of custom rom developers.

However if google finished closing up AOSP, what that would mean is no more future development coming from google. that’s the same with other projects, including harmony: google does not submit patches there either.

you still did not answer how is harmony os a better option than AOSP

we have platforms like that already. several mobile linux distributions, sailfish, whatever. what is the advantage of harmony os? android (as in AOSP) is much more mature all around, the bad parts need to be patched out but then its pretty good. why choose harmony os and leave behind android instead?

ok. but isn’t HarmonyOS as a whole a lot younger? why is it a better choice?

why should we use openharmony if there’s AOSP? we need more hands, but that’s better put on the existing project

you don’t have to. just run dnf upgrade and accept the risks, it will work just the same as before.