That’s rather optimistic. I’m pretty sure it’s daily. Although, perhaps it’s only once a month that it gets upvoted
That’s rather optimistic. I’m pretty sure it’s daily. Although, perhaps it’s only once a month that it gets upvoted
Have you considered moving your email away from Google? It’s easier than you’d expect
I used to see this a lot with Facebook. Every time they altered the design people would kick up a fuss and I never understood why, the new design always looked far better.
Nowadays of course I don’t use Facebook but will occasionally have to sign in to look up the details of a business or something. The design has of course changed and I can’t find a damn thing on it. So I’m finally on board with the masses.
But they aren’t getting forced to change accounts. Their service continues just under another provider.
People who use the default email their ISP gives them don’t like change. The new service will probably have a different login screen and that’s going to upset aunty Ethel and uncle ron. And then a different colour background. It’s the worst thing that anyone could ever do to them
I also found that an odd question.
"you ordered a two pack of Durex extra small and a packet of malteasers. Would you recommend them to a friend? "
No. Because who the hell recommends stuff…? Unless it’s something truly unique im not going to recommend it
Star rating systems don’t accurately convey opinions. The majority of reviews will be either 5* or 1* with only a few wannabe critics voting in between applying their own arbitrary votes.
If Amazon are going to change things then why not adopt something more meaningful. Simple up/down votes for things that actually matter.
Was this product as described: 👍/👎
Are you satisfied with the quality: 👍/👎
Are you satisfied with the value for money: 👍/👎
Then a few optional questions for things that aren’t relevant to the product such as postage/packaging etc.
I will never comprehend how americans accept that store and restaurant prices aren’t the price you’ll pay
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
That’s what I was questioning. Why do do the work but then not make it accessible?
It’s a similar thought to this topic: https://lemmy.world/post/3179113
My main issue with this is it requires a cheat sheet just to view a cheat sheet.
I’ll rephrase. Why require an editor? The most common viewers of SVG do not support layers.
I’ll rephrase. Why require an editor? The most common viewers of SVG do not support layers
Why not export them rather than requiring people to install Inkscape just to view the files?
Mmm. It’s not going to happen though. Even this company have failed at standardising their own API.
Key for twitter: "twitter":
Key for discord: "discordUsername":
Why are they inconsistent?! Who wrote this? Who signed off on it?!
Oh, and for GitHub you provide a url but for twitter and discord it’s just the username?! But the twitter handle has to be prefixed with . Why?!
You must mean ie7, surely?
I was developing for ie6 back in 2010 and I considered those to be dark, dark times. I can’t believe it hung on for another 3 years?
It takes a fair few seconds after clicking play but it does load
Ubuntu because it requires the least amount of hack fixes to get working.
And snap has vastly simplified software installation.