

Who did the retraction is also important. An author voluntarily retracting their own paper is different from the journal retracting the paper.
Who did the retraction is also important. An author voluntarily retracting their own paper is different from the journal retracting the paper.
Exactly, scientists have been saying this forever but evil oversized bipedal crocs sell.
It honestly feels like a marketing issue more than anything. A non-zero amount of people think modern dinosaurs are “boring” because they don’t look like Jurassic Park.
Compared to big fluffy unicorn pigeons that eat each other.
Like people would happily be swooped by a magpie if given the chance.
A knee-high raptor who will happily leap up and bite chunks off of larger prey whilst they’re still alive and kicking seems like it would retain much of the terror.
Eve if he suddenly no longer had influence over Tesla, he’s ruined their reputation enough that others have had time to catch up and make better vehicles.
They can demand it, but you can’t prove a negative.
Didn’t Google replace the normal Google Assistant with Gemini on newer phones?
YouTube also defaults to it, so if you open it, and the video you want is already there, no need to jump to another page to load the exact same video.
Could it be used on someone who is a 7 year old to rid them of this?
No. Gene editing works in this case since they’re just working with a few cells. But a whole human is way more cells. Not only that, but the cells have already developed into structures that are much harder to access, and difficult to change. Any gene therapy may only affect a few cells.
On top of that, there’s also a bunch of ethical issues around altering a human when they’ve already formed, and we don’t really know if it would be possible to do so, or if it would make things worse.
How exactly does one suck a fuck?
With consent, of course.
🦗
As it turns out, there is a cricket emoji.
for being violet
But what if it was chartreuse?
Depending on how they do it, not having to deal with hydrogen infrastructure might be nice, if they keep along with the plan to use refillable cartridges. Hydrogen is a bit more fiddly.
Although this seems much more reliant on humidity compared to a hydrogen fuel cell, which seems like a huge hole if the thing just won’t work if it’s a dry day/environment.
The censorship only exists on the version they host, which is fair enough. If they’re running it themselves in China, they can’t just break the law.
If you run it yourself, the censorship isn’t there.
It’s also much easier to implement.
Not really. Why censor more than you have to? That takes time and effort, and it’s almost certainly easier to do it using something else. The law isn’t that particular, as long as you follow it.
You also don’t risk causing the model to go wrong, like trying to censor bits of the model has a habit of doing.
Only for some things, though. If you host your own e-mail these days, chances are, you’re going to have a very difficult time sending them anywhere without risking them being deleted, or automatically thrown into spam folders.
Remind me in 3 days.
Although poison pills are only so effective since it’s a cat and mouse game, and they only really work for a specific version of a model, with other models working around it.
People have just been doing dumb things for reputation since forever. We had the cinnamon challenge back in our day.
I was envisioning “improvised heart surgery” as in a stabbing with a knife, as opposed to any surgical function.
But generally, if a someone is having a medical emergency and is brought into the ER, or is having a medical emergency in the ER, they will be triaged, and put ahead of a lot of people whose care isn’t as urgent, for good reason.
Ah, the technocratic solution. “We’re fine leaving things as-is, because someone will invent a thing to fix it soon”.
Google Play is separate from Android. Google likely updates it through that route, rather than relying on manufacturers.