![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/f8f243fd-d724-46c6-9e66-ea167708f5e4.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8286e071-7449-4413-a084-1eb5242e2cf4.png)
For anyone looking for a good iOS front end for their Audiobookshelf instance, I can highly recommended Plappa (and off topic Paperparrot for paperless by the same dev). One off and affordable purchase, no subscription.
For anyone looking for a good iOS front end for their Audiobookshelf instance, I can highly recommended Plappa (and off topic Paperparrot for paperless by the same dev). One off and affordable purchase, no subscription.
Appreciate the walkthrough and follow up.
Sacrilege!
You got your answers before, you just don’t want to accept them. The relationship between budget and performance expectation still borders delusion.
To quote u/Peachman who hit the nail on the head:
Looking for recommendations for a racecar, at least 800 horsepower. Needs to hit 60 mph in under 4 seconds. My budget is $2000. Please give recommendations. LOL
Fork out more money or lower your expectation.
merguez
I see you are a person of culture.
Have you tried turning it off and back on again?
Witchcraft!! They’re speaking in tongues, get them!!
deleted by creator
mens rea : a culpable mental state especially : one involving intent or knowledge and forming an element of a criminal offense
It doesn’t. Otherwise one could just say “Sorry I was daydreaming and simply didn’t today attention.” and get off the liability. This is, in fact, the relevant word:
Many traffic offences, including speeding, are considered strict liability offences in virtually every jurisdiction, which means that it is sufficient to prove that the act occurred and it is unnecessary to prove intent. In such cases, whether or not an offender meant to commit the offence is irrelevant. For strict liability offences, lawyers are unable to argue that the offender had no knowledge or intentions of committing the offence because what counts is whether the offence was committed.
A judge would simply look if the elements are proven:
a) the offence was committed b) no lawful excuse or defence for doing so exists
However, there is the defence of reasonable mistake. This means that it is sometimes possible for strict liability traffic offences to be refuted if the offender can successfully argue and provide evidence to show that they were genuinely mistaken and did not know they were committing the offence. However, this is different from the mens rea principle.
About tree fiddy.
It’s ok. We have called the mind police and they’re on their way. Open up when you hear the knocking or the door will be put in.
X-Copy! YES! Mate, that’s a solid throwback for me. I had totally forgotten about this gem.
Thanks so much for bringing back that memory!
X gonna give it to ya
Very happy with Plappa. Highly recommend. One off purchase, no subscription.