![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8286e071-7449-4413-a084-1eb5242e2cf4.png)
This is true. Would probably be much easier technically and legally if they already own it, though.
This is true. Would probably be much easier technically and legally if they already own it, though.
That’s interesting. So they buy the domain on your behalf and then rent it out to you. Pretty cool concept
That said, I’ve owned a fair few domains and never had to deal with 3rd parties, so I’m not sure if the added security risk (however small) of them hijacking your domain is worth it. For me, at least. YMMV
What makes a registrar more privacy focused than another. Just had a read of their website, but couldn’t understand why they’re better for privacy than any other
I’ve not heard about this. Does anyone have a link to share? Can’t find one myself
What do you mean with “went to bed”?
This was a well written and interesting piece from someone who knows about the subject matter. What a refreshing piece of content. Thank you for sharing
finance
even stuff like £ is unsupported.
Probably not an issue then…
Memory is not storage, so you would need to be logging what’s in memory, I guess. Not impossible, but also not trivial either.
Honestly I’m not sure how it could be done, but I’m sure it’s possible
Digital market act https://digital-markets-act.ec.europa.eu/index_en
Chat apps are only part of it. It will force iOS and android to offer competing app market too.
The bridges need to decrypt your messages before encrypting them again to send them to you. This is done in memory, so it’s not impossible for your messages to be read by beeper, but quite difficult.
That said, self hosting will always be a safer option. It’s just not for everyone
The EU is forcing the big chat companies to open their gates. They have until April of next year to comply, so we might see a common protocol for chat pretty soon
Do you mean something link
subdomain.domain.tld
? Because I have that set up with namecheap