My only pair of earbuds have a wire. The connector is usb-c and my phone has a jack. So I don’t even use the jack now
3.5 headphones that have volume controls and a pause/hang up button can’t seem to last a year. I tried 2 and they both lasted 3 months
Imagine if they distributed one of those that contained a strange bind syscall somewhere with a reverse shell.
Mark discovers hyperbola
If your goal is to get back scratches from the circlejerk don’t feel the need to participate lol
Cool, but there’s no shot any serious software company will want that shit under their brand
That’s definitely not what Google told me to do at the time in 2015
What you gonna repair it for? It’s not like it’s gonna work
Having to create .desktop files in god knows where for me to be able to right click -> “open with” my program of choice sure pushed me away
I don’t even know what they were thinking not letting you beowse for any executable file on disk
I wish implicit returns could be turned into an error in the configs of a project. It was impopular at the time and probably still is outside of Rust, it permeated through every control structure because of how the language is designed, but the worst part is how unnecessary it was
It would’ve cost nothing not to do it
It would’ve made no one upset
Now Rust is the only language to do what it does - and it has this shit in it
“The snippersnappers should focus on making the fax machine faster”, Biden reportedly said
This is not a good article
To know if an email is a scam I would check the domain of the link it’s sending, which this doesn’t provide
Also you shouldn’t trust the sender address of an email, you can spoof that
That’s cool, but I’m not making software for desktop linux until there’s one standard GUI api
How would it depend?
What the “no such thing as a free lunch” mentality does to a mf
Step up the reading comprehension please :)
It’s pretty funny having you state, re-state and re-re-state the exact same obvious things that everyone understands while not seeing that everyone gets that, that you’re missing the point, and that you’re yelling in a hole
Why do you keep going?
Are you that painfully unconvincing in real life like cmon
Step it up
Step up the reading comprehension please :)
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1466A
(a) In General.—Any person who, in a circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly produces, distributes, receives, or possesses with intent to distribute, a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that— (1) (A) depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and (B) is obscene; or (2) (A) depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; and (B) lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value; or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be subject to the penalties provided in section 2252A(b)(1), including the penalties provided for cases involving a prior conviction.
You’re really mad that a US based study is using the US definition of CSAM while also clearly stating the definition of CSAM they’re using, aren’t you?
Sure buddy, it’s a “false equivalence”, they’re totally stating it’s the same. It’s not just your reading comprehension
There’s no definite conclusion on whether consuming and distributing lolicon content could lead some individuals to seek out or create explicit content involving real children
If they rule that out entirely through the scientific method one day, then I’ll join your side
Weebs usually respond to that “Well that’s like saying video games cause violence!” so I’ll jump ahead of you, that would be like saying we should forbid Lolicon videogames in a society that already has lolicon books, lolicon movies, lolicon cartoons and where history classes mostly cover instances of countries showing lolicon to each other. That’s not the situation we’re in, and even if it was, it’s still not necessarily comparable. Sexual urges have properties that violence doesn’t share.
I’d never bother changing whatever default font the editor comes with and I don’t understand why anyone would care to