What do you mean building our own systems?

The TSA press office said in a statement that this vulnerability could not be used to access a KCM checkpoint because the TSA initiates a vetting process before issuing a KCM barcode to a new member. However, a KCM barcode is not required to use KCM checkpoints, as the TSO can enter an airline employee ID manually. After we informed the TSA of this, they deleted the section of their website that mentions manually entering an employee ID, and did not respond to our correction. We have confirmed that the interface used by TSOs still allows manual input of employee IDs.

TSA: lalala i can’t hear you, everything is fine, no issue here

Yeah, clearly the author doesn’t know about the Loch Ness monster

They’ve said that they release the source code after it’s running in production:

sorry the source for one of our services was so far behind. We often don’t push source until we release things, and there were a few overlapping releases that happened in that period which made it awkward to push at any moment and put us behind. Additionally, we’ve seen a large increase in spam, and a reluctance to immediately publish the exact anti-spam measures we were responding with to a place where spammers could immediately see them combined with the above to cause this extreme delay.

https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Android/issues/11101#issuecomment-815400676

please tell me you created a dick object for the project which is exactly the same as a dict object.

Defending Windows in a linux memes community.

That’s a bold move cotton, let’s see how that works out for 'em

Does it not have epoch set to 1970-01-01 00:00:00? Or does the PDP-11 only use a non power of 2 number of bits, and you’ve already set the clock back before? Genuinely curious, never heard of 2029 problem before.

Just remember to take off on 2038-01-19

Have you tried turning it off and back on again?

Have you tried turning it off and back on again?

Have you tried turning it off and back on again?

Have you tried turning it off and back on again?

Have you tried turning it off and back on again?

Have you tried turning it off and back on again?

Have you tried turning it off and back on again?

Have you tried turning it off and back on again?

Have you tried turning it off and back on again?

Have you tried turning it off and back on again?

Have you tried turning it off and back on again?

Have you tried turning it off and back on again?

Have you tried turning it off and back on again?

Have you tried turning it off and back on again?

Have you tried turning it off and back on again?

Wayback Machine link too: https://web.archive.org/web/20240717171003/https://www.wired.com/story/priscila-queen-of-the-rideshare-mafia/

I’ve never heard of an on prem offering, which tier is that on? None of the plans mention it? https://slack.com/pricing

I had to manage a Slack migration to another org we were merging with. As the owner, normally I couldn’t even see the names of private channels, but when it came down to the migration, upgrading the account to Business+ tier, the full export included everything (private channels and DMs), which we imported into the new org.

Slack sends notifications to all Admins that the export was happening, and i’ve only seen that notification once after using Slack for 10 years.

I don’t think Slack has a self hosted version, and does not offer IP allow listing. There’s nothing preventing someone to go to https://disney.slack.com/. I think when they say “internal” they mean for internal employees, and not like a thing for fans.

It feels like this needs to be managed on an instance by instance level and not post to post.

Anti-Anti-Anti Commercial-Anti-AI license

Seriously, now that this is more widely known, it’ll for sure be taken advantage of a lot, to the point AWS will begrudgingly protect their customers once the damage is done.

This is what I’ve read about where users in AD can be federated to FreeIPA: https://www.freeipa.org/page/V4/One-way_trust. Not sure if this covers your use case

No need to guess, it’s all outlined in the bill:

1. ByteDance has 270 days (+90 days at president discretion) to divest of TikTok and sell to an entity not affiliated with an “adversary country” (China, Iran, Russia, N. Korea).
2. If they don’t sell, hosting providers of TikTok application (servers, storage, app store, etc) will be fined up to $500 times the number of users in the US if they continue to host the application
3. ISPs are explicitly excluded from the bill, and not considered data brokers, which is what the restrictions apply to.

So basically, the law will not require ISPs to block access to TikTok domains and IP addresses. Google search results are also explicitly excluded from the term data broker, and exempt from the restrictions. The only requirement is for app stores to stop hosting the application, so existing installations of the app (after January 2025 assuming ByteDance doesn’t sell) will presumably persist and can be used, even if TikTok is banned.

It’s my understanding that FreeIPA can federate with Active Directory, but personally I haven’t tried that myself. As for Authentik, it looks interesting but it’s the first I’ve heard of it. I also rely on FreeIPA’s certmonger implementation, so I wonder if Authentik could replace that?

Just to understand your use case, you have users in Active Directory where you want to manage SSH keys and be able to login via SSH to linux machines?

Exactly, like how an ocean liner is a step up above a sailboat. That doesn’t mean you’re unsinkable and don’t need to worry about icebergs.

Windows is banned in my household, so l’m not worried about malware.

This is a false sense of security and just because you’re not running Windows doesn’t mean you’re immune to everything and can let your defenses down. For example, KDE recently had to announce that downloading themes will execute arbitrary code and cited someone who had personal information deleted because of downloading a theme.