![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/q98XK4sKtw.png)
I think XFCE has way more themes etc. Both are extremely themable though.
I think XFCE has way more themes etc. Both are extremely themable though.
No, I understand your points. I may think you need to specify what you mean by “customizable”. A lot of stuff users normally do, like theming, installing random stuff etc, works. You can layer, build your own image etc.
But this is not the point as OP was frustrated about having an OS that even though promising to be reliable still breaks.
And whining about “oh I cant tweak it” is just not at the correct place there.
But of course my answers were kinda harsh, sorry for that. But these issues are really nonissues if your priority is having a working system.
I mean, Github is literally the source of 2 operating systems I run. And most of my apps.
Ah okay but is that useful in many cases? Only when you are home.
Really?? This is crazy.
Afaik headscale is the selfhosted server. You can likely login however you want.
Yeah as they have the same app ID I need to clone, change the app ID and build with my own Key. That is fine and I may do that for a bunch of repos.
Already found them but that is not a nice way.
I am getting AndroidStudio Flatpak currently and will just build the APK myself. Lets see how hard that is.
Static IPs are not a thing in most countries. You need an overlay network or dynamic DNS like NoIP.
Headscale is a downstream of tailscale, meaning it has a fraction of the features and is maintained by Tailscale employees.
But great for less trust.
To get more versed infos, visit discussion.fedoraproject.org
We have tags there, many knowledgeable people, and can help better.
Run it through the terminal.
Which is still irrelevant for OPs thread. It is actually the opposite. The more you diverge from upstream, the more you need to vendor your changes.
That means if your mums PC breaks, you are responsible ;)
This should be done out of the box. The implementation depends on the desktop.
Which is why for quality assurance, at most 2 desktops should be supported and prioritized like that.
This is not relevant to the topic about issues with the stability of atomic desktops
What we need is a popup IN THE OS that tells users how to troubleshoot.
Separate from the OS core, updatable individually, like an RSS feed with persistent popups using KDialog etc.
Says the person with a “Twitter verified badge” as profile pic LOL.
What has this to do with ANYTHING I wrote?
No Atomic systems make all sense.
They are literally the reason why an unstable distro like Fedora is robust.
Customization is all done on the mutable areas, home partition etc. A new user profile equals a new vanilla desktop.
Yes, you cannot mess with the core architecture of the OS. Things need to be centralized.
But you realize, similar to GNOME removing theming, that if you have one way that everyone can test, you have way less bugs.
As a KDE user I would be really fine having way less customizability and more stability. I am very fine with the default in most cases.
A well designed system does not require customization, and to be an OS used by the world, Linux needs good defaults.
Keep an eye on CentOS bootc
And the CentOS hyperscale SIG (Youtube presentation, newer update) is basically taking CentOS and backporting or just using tons of Fedora packages on there, for better performance.
I think they use the Fedora Kernel which would still be problematic, as the current 6.6 LTS kernel is still way newer than the 5.14 CentOS kernel (with tons of backports).
I agree that Fedora Atomic NEEDS a way to have GUI messages via an RSS feed arrive to all users by default.
KDE Plasma has an RSS widget by default I think. Will open a discussion about that.
Try KDE Plasma, you can strip out a ton of it, for example XOrg entirely, baloo, animations, etc.