• 1 Post
  • 351 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: April 30th, 2024

help-circle











  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldgoodbye plex
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I’ve been using jellyfin for years.

    My best recommendation is DELAY UPDATES and back up before you update.

    I have a history of updates breaking everything so you should be careful about them.

    All software recommends backing up before an update, but for jellyfin the shit is real, you really want to back up.



  • How does it differentiate an “AI crawler”, from any other crawler? Search engine crawler? Someone monitoring data to offer statistics? Archiving?

    This is not good. They are most likely doing the crawling themselves and them selling the data to the best bidder. That bidder could obviously be openAI for all we know.

    They just know that introducing the sentence “this is anti AI” a lot of people is not going to question anything.


  • Google CO2 emissions were 1.5 MTo in 2010. By 2018 they were 13 MTo. In 2023 they were 14 MTo.

    I’m sorry but there’s more to the story that what’s being told in the article. For starters any dataset that takes 2019/2020 as their base line is skewed, we all know what happened that year.

    And, on the other hand, Google emissions increased by almost a 1000% in ten years before AI.

    Truth is more important than that agenda or the dogma. That article does the wild assumption that a big share of the increase in electricity usage is because AI. It may be, or it may not be, but the article presents zero evidences for that claim. And data in hand we know that google can use a ton of electricity without AI. So the impact of AI may or may not be as big as portrayed by the article. And it also disregards completely the massive increases in google emissions before 2019.