I have one of the affected CPUs 😒
I have one of the affected CPUs 😒
huh I got a new layout today but it has AI features in the search? I don’t like it. I switched to signal and forced everyone but a stubborn few to follow.
I work in a company with other people. it’s not a good idea to have an idea where you have to specialise in a range of things to be successful. I specialise in programming.
also, those benchmarks translate to better user experience which means they actually use our product, and lower hosting costs.
frameworks and patterns reduce bugs and let us create features quickly. it’s important, if you think it’s pointless maybe it’s not for you. if you want to go do a startup instead, good luck.
The best kind of correct.
in a world with dwindling resources people are satisfied with something they already own. sounds wonderful.
I’m happy people are sharing stuff to Lemmy, it’s been a little quiet.
I definitely value the Forbes article over the MSN but we might not be talking about it if we hadn’t seen this post. let’s not be too critical when people are participating positively.
that’s literally the whole point of this?
the point of this is a new youtube is unlikely to take off because people can’t start using it without missing all their regular content.
this means you can keep all your regular content and add new sources, with the same creators, which means they can start to move to new platforms and take their followers. that’s how we’ll replace youtube.
they did good
edit: tbh honest i think it was around 5 years ago i started being able to identify things with google lens on my phone. they worked fast!
I’m not very outraged. It’s a chatbot, not an employee who should “know better”
also Hitler was an effective leader, which we should all remember as a cautionary tale about how effective horrible people can be
pretending he was bad at everything because we hate him is a great way to not learn from history
I’m actually cool with that. have a big dataset? charge a fee to use it for training
I’d rather like it if they train it on stuff I say. I want the AI of tomorrow to reflect my thoughts.
seriously I would much prefer gold tier journalism and news sites let it crawl so when people use it to make choices in the future they’re guided to better choices.
it is honestly so hard to know what will happen though, it’s so complicated it’s virtually guaranteed we’re not correctly anticipating the consequences of any of this. I’m not really even talking about the AI, I’m talking about the effects on society which are a lot more complex.
embedded tweets just look like they have a close button now
I’m enjoying the irony of the automatic ai summary to read this for us.
I don’t want a factory job though. I want a world that’s organised well enough that people don’t starve when you don’t have menial labour for them to waste their lives on to justify being fed.
feeding and housing is just logistics and we’re good at that. let the robots do physical work and continue feeding people as before.
Bruce Y Lee is only producing one a day but if you include Bruce A through X Lee, you get a lot more articles…
he could easily just be a bit burnt out and be using chat gpt to give him the bones of an article and a bunch of “amusing” phrases and stringing it together himself.
it’d probably what I’d do if i was a journo right now.
I’m a developer and I always leave telemetry on … when it’s my code I find it useful when there’s a problem so it gets fixed faster. As long as it’s not being used to target ads at me I’m happy to help, esp when it’s free software?
if we use embedding and the language documentation, I wonder how much it can work out going forward?
ahhh that makes sense. i was remembering microsoft getting broken up/fined and wondered how an “everything company” could possibly avoid that. turns out you have to have a monopoly to start with, which might have been an issue before he tanked twitter. so i guess genius move, 5d chess etc
it’s a case where he knows a guy just like Ronald but he’s not naming him, so he’s just talking about “Ronald”