Oh dear, that post from the core-js guy made my blood boil. He’s been taken advantage of by the whole world.
Oh dear, that post from the core-js guy made my blood boil. He’s been taken advantage of by the whole world.
Objects weren’t properly saving in a game, so the developer showed me what code I could copy paste to enable objects to save. Much like Thanos, “fine, I’ll do it myself”.
Interesting. I welcome any change that drives it away from being purely for Apple apps. Funny and creative use of the slider element for the iOS version.
Thank you for explaining and for the article, that makes sense. I can’t see any reason against having it, but I’ve never had to interact with that so I’m not qualified enough to form a concrete opinion!
Can someone explain this article? I’m not sure what signing a commit is. If it’s the information appended with a commit (username, time of commit, commit message), then it sounds insane to be against that. It’s so helpful to not only know who did what in case you need to reach out to the person behind something, but also knowing the why behind it can be important.
The majority of the issues the author has seem strange to me. I can understand not wanting GitHub to be this central authority. However, in what world is making a commit to a repo indicative of one endorsing every single line in a repo? And the security issues just come down to “don’t let your data leak”. Though that could be an issue if GitHub leaks it themselves.
What in the fuck is this title.
Hilarious but their fault for not making a standard. The guy was just taking the initiative.
As stupid as it is, hoping to see the results. It does sound like a neat experiment but even if it is “successful” (my definition probably differs from their’s), a good teacher is more than just a learning tool. AI would never replace the empathy and dedication.