Hmm… was advanced data protection enabled?
Hmm… was advanced data protection enabled?
You should be able to sign in though…
Just beware that Affinity won’t work well (there’s been an attempt with a custom version of Wine that I haven’t tried: https://github.com/daniel080400/AffinityLinuxTut)
Maybe the kernel? :)
Don’t worry, it’s both
Yes, but globally means around the globe :)
OP is right, though… https://stats.labs.apnic.net/ipv6/XA
RTC chip, IIRC
I think tauri uses the OS web view, so it depends
Also, doas instead of sudo
Also, SAS -> Serial Attached SCSI
I definitely agree!
Exactly that. Router A
ip address add 192.168.1.1/24 dev eth1
ip address add 10.0.0.1/30 dev eth2
ip route add 192.168.2.0/24 via 10.0.0.2
Router B
ip address add 192.168.2.1/24 dev eth1
ip address add 10.0.0.2/30 dev eth2
ip route add 192.168.1.0/24 via 10.0.0.1
Does this make it more clear?
Hmmm it seems that router B there should be a bridge. However, how comfortable are you with routing in general?
Traceroute from device in subnet A to device in subnet B
Note that the only way to do that in only two hops is to have the same router handle both subnets, contrary to what I said earlier.
No, not at all 🙂. I’m referring to a configuration in which the two routers are linked through another subnet (using a separate link between the two) and this link is the point to point link. You usually assign a /30 so you can have an address for each router. ~This way the traceroute shows three hops instead of just two.~ However, since you’ve already told us that this is not your setup, what I’m saying shouldn’t matter to you. If you’re curious though, let’s keep talking :)
Edit: striked mistake
No, with PtP I meant a point to point link on a dedicated interface just for the two routers. https://image2.slideserve.com/5192070/point-to-point-sub-interfaces-l.jpg
This works if B has an interface that is connected to the A subnet, but not if you have a PtP between the two routers
We have these in Europe too