• 0 Posts
  • 325 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: September 9th, 2023

help-circle
  • Great article, I’m going to send this one around, thanks!

    But I’d like to make a distinction: LLMs are not just tools, it’s more basic; they’re just math.

    As the author themself said: Claude, Codex, and so on are tools built using LLMs.

    They drive you towards slop not least because they’re only available as subscription models that you pay for by token.

    Maybe commodification will lead to super terse models that run on personal or institutional servers, and exist as an advanced rubber duck to test your assumptions against. Totally thinkable with LLMs, yet very far from our current reality.



  • What makes them call LLMs “fascist”? I guess you could say that individuals who aren’t super rich can’t train them by themselves, so relying on them currently means you’re relying on these fuckers.

    That would be quite the stretch though …

    The response to the mail seems to think the same:

    Not sure if there’s any point in saying this, but the fact that the technology has notable companies pushing it forward that are often associated with fascism does not mean that the technology itself is somehow inextricably linked to fascism, just like how Microsoft making an operating system doesn’t associate operating systems in general with Microsoft or their goals. The GR was concerned with the technology as a whole AFAICT, not the companies developing some variants of it.













    1. Types.

      You explode lists manually into items when calling commands on a variable list of arguments instead of “quoting variables” to prevent them from exploding.

      Who came up with the bullshit idea that exploding strings into words is such a common use case that this footgun is preferable to have an “explode lists” syntax?

    2. Errors. No more set -euo pipefail; shopt -s lastpipe to beat some semblance of sanity into bash