And before that books and comics. But LLMs are different: they pretend to be your friend but actually just encourage whatever you come up with. You can easily fry people’s brains by being their sycophant, now everyone can subscribe to one.

Nah, people just started using LLM assisted vuln discovery workflows and having early successes with them.

There will be diminishing returns.

Two mistakes:

1. The all setting makes little sense, unless someone wants to enforce a zero-AI policy. It shouldn’t have been the default. In-line completions don’t justify attribution, so the chatAndAgents setting makes more sense (there can be more arguments made about uncopyrightable LLM output and the fact that “creation height” can’t be automatically determined)
2. The code is bugged and attributed the contributions of other LLMs to copilot

The one you cited is more of a safety measure against the intersection of these two issues: if the code would work correctly, it wouldn’t add the copilot line anyway.

You wrote

Because to you it’s virtually meaningless other than some weird nostalgia

responding to my comment. I didn’t take any side, let alone argued from with nostalgia; where does the “you” come from?

Can you not put words into my mouth?

Nobody knows what a “gimp” is supposed to be.

How is arguing for one side of the issue “not seeing the value of anyone else’s opinion”.

It’s even more ironic: the palantiri were built as communication devices, to be used for good by the right people. Then Sauron came to power and immediately used them to corrupt and spy on the rulers using them.

So they are dangerous tools that are just one bad government away from being used for horrible things. WHY DID THEY BUILD THEM THEN?

JS at least has no UB around every corner for “performance”.

Absolutely not, name one example of something that isn’t true.

All criticism in the video is both well-founded and serious. The presentation is humorous.

The video is great. The voice is real, the script too. If you have carpal tunnel you won’t be able to illustrate it any other way except for by commissioning someone. And would you do that for a video that you give out for free?

Because of his voice. Do you need justification for your meat flaps to sound the way you do? His voice is real and just sounds like that. Rude.

No, the voice is real, the script is real, it goes immensely in depth, and I really enjoyed it despite the images.

It’s wrong. The voice is not AI.

Yeah, these people never do their research. Its very easy to find the discussions and reasoning the devs had at the time.

That especially disqualifies the conspiracy idiots who come up with myths about Red Hat or Poettering or Microsoft or so puppeteering Linux into its dooooom

Nah, the issue is accidental corruption, different parsers doing things differently, stuff like that. Happens often with “mostly text but actually some structured data also” formats, doesn’t happen with formats that have well specified framing.

Because most people prefer it. Again: having a minority taste doesn’t mean you’re oppressed when there’s an option to have what you want.

Read. I’m saying that you lied, not that your preferences are bad.

Systemd doesn’t force you to use binlogs.

Can you add more fields? Is there no ambiguity in context switching? No breakage around whitespace?

If so, sure, that’s fine then.