As a result there’s a capacity crunch on memory production, shooting the prices for RAM sky high, over 100 percent in the last few months alone

They said “market price”… What market are you shopping at?!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KXrQYWbbIs

In a logical world it would be. But criminally I don’t think anywhere differentiates type of weapon other than “firearm” and “deadly”.

They need to fully separate it from date rape too. Back in my younger days I knew 3 different dudes who got dosed out at bars. I highly doubt they were intended rape victims, but a lot of robberies start out with someone slipping something into your drink, then getting you in the parking lot.

Drugging anyone for anyone reason should qualify as attempted manslaughter. Which, counter intuitively is a real charge.

It makes it easier to charge rapists too because you don’t have to prove rape, and can even charge them before a rape happens. If you can prove rape, throw it on top as additional charges.

I mean, they literally are weapons…

Potentially deadly

Sessions at the summit, which Nature attended, covered a wide range of health-related topics, including psychedelics, brain implants and anti-ageing therapies. Academic researchers or clinicians were not among the speakers at the sessions, which were peppered by comments critical of the medical establishment.

I don’t know if that was an intentional joke, but fucking hilarious to add that.

The molehill is your focus on the word believe

If I walked up and took a sandwich out of you hand and ate, would you say:

I believe that’s my sandwich

And expect me to give it back? Or anyone to help you?

Or do you think:

You just stole my sandwich

Would be more effective?

You’re acting like this is one isolated incident with zero consequences…

And I readily admit, I over estimate people’s critical thinking abilities, but it seems very clear with how Israel and Russia treat borders, and how chummy with them trump is, that this could very likely be the start of the same behavior.

But like I said, I often think shit is ridiculously obvious just to find out other people just can’t connect the dots.

I’ll never understand why people get so belligerent instead of just asking questions till they understand.

Can you at least tell me why you didn’t want to ask questions when you ran into something you didn’t understand?

It’s a widespread issue, and I legitimately want some insight into your choices here.

You think a hostile nation’s military headed by a demented narcissist showing up on another country’s sovereign soil and placing signs that it belongs to a different country…

Is a molehill?

Buddy, if you don’t understand why something is serious, I’d highly advise you to ask questions instead of loudly proclaim it’s not a big deal

What??

This wasn’t a random place, it’s a fucking beach with people who go there routinely…

What “great lengths” did you think it would take to determine which side of Trump’s ridiculous fence this was on?

You think people that live and work right next to the border, are unsure about where the border is?

You think it’s something you can accidentally wander across?

Mexico knew that beach was theirs, but when pushed they said it might be instead of saber rattling that America just tried to seize a fucking landinghead

They also said unauthorized access or photography was not allowed in that area and that ‘if you are found here, you may be detained and searched.’ Mexico’s foreign affairs ministry said its navy removed the signs from the sand, which it believed were on Mexican territory."

That’s the result they wanted.

It’s Mexico, clear as day, but Mexico just waffled on it and said they “believed” it was Mexico.

They’ll take a page out of Israel’s playbook and start saying “until we figure this out, it’s a buffer zone”. Then just keep expanding it and not obstructing Americans from “settling” there, once they’re established, then it’s obviously America because why else would Americans be living there?

Less than three sugar cubes’ worth of plastic

Good, I was wondering why they were using “handful” for marine animals…

But still makes no sense considering the size difference of marine animals.

So instead of X disabling it…

Only Apple did

NK is so pissed because a single SSBN pointed at wherever Kim is would prevent NK from ever launching any kind of attack.

If all of SKs nukes are on land, it’s conceivable (but very unlikely) they could somehow take them all out before they fire.

An SSBN is a deadmans switch. You can glass an entire country in an instant, but the SSBN will still get you back.

The scientist may be right…

But that blog also thinks aliens are here and all types of other crazy shit

No good war but a class war, and one side has always been fighting it…

Gavazzeni added: “There were no political or religious motivations. They were rich people who went there for fun and personal satisfaction.

I mean…

He inherited an Israeli spy ring from Maxwell’s dad…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Maxwell#Mossad_allegations;_Vanunu_case

Who also worked with a bunch of Eastern bloc countries.

While mostly infamous for raping kids and blackmailing other pedophiles, that wasn’t all he was doing for Israel. Just like it wasn’t all his (essentially) father in law did.

Weird jump after defending a multi billionaire govenor that won’t defend his citizens and just wants to make sound bites…

Nope, the wealth inequality makes them sociopaths too…

It’s a hard reality, but if me or you had Elon’s net worth, we’d be just as fucking weird and just as dangerous to everyone else.

Like, as much as people say it, people don’t realize how much just a single billion is. Just a single billion is enough to fuck up anyone. Like 100 million, some people might be able to remain relatively normal. But a billion would get us all.

What you’re doing is the same as writing of the Nazi movement as Germans being intrinsically violent or sociopathic. When obviously that shit can happen anywhere.

It’s just a very hard truth to face, so we rationalize by saying “those people” were born evil.

No one is inherently good, just some people are properly socialized to be “good”. And we need to accept that so we stay vigilant against it.

Pay morally bankrupt actresses to dress up as a videogame chare ter for sex work then leak the photo to brag about it…

Then probably all the shit Dubai princes do.

That level of money will fuck you up, because not just the human brain, but damn near every living organism is wired to always want more.

No matter what kind of thing you find enjoyable, if you have acces to it 24/7 then your going to get bored and move onto something more extreme.

Why do you think all these old rich/powerful people become rapists and child molesters?

It’s not that they were necessarily born evil, this is just the “natural result” of someone having this insane level of wealth inequality. Which honestly doesn’t even.make the top ten lists of why we need to address wealth/power inequality, but like…

Certainly topical when trump won’t release the Epstein list because it says he raped kids.

except in the case there is no source or there assertion it is a genocide is “seriously contested”.

I think a big part of this, is how Wikipedia was never meant to be a source for developing news…

Like, 1943 the nazis would have seriously contested any of the multiple genocides that were committed. Or US/Canadian treatment of their Indigenous populations at the time.

But it’s “logic” like in actual logic classes in college.

They could have 37 different examples of how what Israel is doing meets a definition of genocide, with video evidence, and a list of everyone who says it’s a genocide…

But their job isn’t to draw the conclusion, it never was.

And I get wanting Wikipedia to say it is, because it undeniably is.

But the opposite of biased reporting isn’t biasing it the other way. It’s counterintuitive, but it’s easier to hold onto a nonbiased organization than one biased in your direction. The pendulum swings faster the higher up it is. You can’t push it the way you want it to go, you have to hold it as still as possible.

because only 30 or so countries have formally recognized it.

Since you couldn’t find a link I did

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaza_genocide_recognition

30 is more than twice 14…

But that’s the gist of it.

Wikipedia can’t say Bob committed a genocide, they can’t “say” anything except “____ said ____”

Like that link, that lists every country who has said Israel is commiting a genocide…

which would also apply to other accepted genocides

Can you give me an example where despite lots of evidence of genocide, there’s not been an international ruling declaring genocide yet Wikipedia still says it’s a genocide?

To me, that would be the smoking gun that this was a biased move.

But what he is saying now is how it should always be. Throw all the evidence and sources up there, and make it clear that it hasn’t been ruled a genocide yet officially, maybe even have a section on how that process has been going and who’s opposing it.

That would be how to do it right.