There’s no one thirstier than someone with a coding question.

I like that this can condemn either side

Dude is Finnish, from his own mouth, it’s just normal racism against an aggressive imperial, like how people hate the us

Edit: like how people from lemmy.ml hate Americans, if that wasn’t clear

AI and the discussion around it doesn’t live in a vacuum.

Occasionally you’ll get shit opinions like this. Easy slutty greek frat bro strawmen that’ll sleep with anything that moves and then dodge child support payments.

We all have to remember the true Chad argument against AI is that it’s built on degenerate theft and corporate soulless shills. AI is the Shikrelli of creativity.

They crave the algorithm

+1 it’ll be fine

You only need to worry about wire length and ringing when you’re talking radio or modern CPU or graphics cards speeds. Anything pi related will be fine

Someone else will eventually figure it out. They probably have less scruples and will therefore profit.

Seems to me like there’s always an incentive structure for prisoner’s dilemma type shit to eventually pay off for the authoritarians in the end. You can play the game, but you can’t break it or stop or from being rigged without consequences. Even just releasing some research papers will get you a few decades in the fed.

We i need to tech bro take over whatever industry actually gets to all 7 bln

Wild that the video game industry is so big, and this still isn’t even 1% of people on earth.

I used to follow the Penrose stuff and was pretty excited about QM as an explanation of consciousness. If this is the kind of work they’re reaching at though. This is pretty sad. It’s not even anything. Sometimes you need to go with your gut, and my gut is telling me that if this is all the QM people have, consciousness is probably best explained by complexity.

https://ask.metafilter.com/380238/Is-this-paper-on-quantum-propeties-of-the-brain-bad-science-or-not

Completely off topic from ai, but got me curious about brain quantum and found this discussion. Either way, AI still sucks shit and is just a shortcut for stealing.

If the bots are already using gpt4 then a little crypto heat is essentially the same thing

Wow, you pulled some pup stuff, nice

Can you say fuck spez?

On the fediverse we do not have to worry about upsetting coka cola or spez because a swear appeared next to their advertisement or name. Not that many people care about that elsewhere, but we especially don’t care about it here. I think that’s worth calling attention to every once in a while. It doesn’t always have to be swears as the vehicle to remind us that the power dynamic is different here.

It’s fucking nice to be reminded there no corpo overlords here sometimes, though. Which is ironic that sometimes the foss benevolent dictators for life aren’t always benevolent.

I knew this tickled something

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smalltalk

Source?

I didn’t know about antenna pod, and I assumed you were just being mean.

Why rss self hosting and seemingly complicated? I thought push notifications needed a back end of some kind. I didn’t think that was possible with just a podcast app

K

Agreed.

Funny that I think you tapped into another politicized proxy argument here. People want their kids to get a good education, but they didn’t want it to be woke.

Things were better when it was puritanical teaching and sex – and anything about sex – was bad and parents didn’t have to think about their little horny teenagers touching each other. Gross, right?

Hence, book bans instead of education funding.

I had an interaction a few weeks ago where I made the same obvious statement – that everything is political, like the price of milk is political – and the someone said I was making it political, like gun rights.

That conversation stopped there unfortunately, but it made me realize something.

Politicized is different from political for a lot of people.

Maybe most people realize the price of gas is political, but they don’t think that their internet bill, or whatever, is political. It’s just market forces to them, or whatever they assume about capitalism being good.

Ultimately, I think my point is that when people say things like foss shouldn’t be political, I think they’re saying they agree, but they would lose their in-group status be agreeing with something “woke” like ethics in software. So they have to make a proxy argument about what is and isn’t political.