The point is that your argument falls apart considering it kept being propped up by your assertion that kids can just use the library computers if they’re too poor to have a computer at home.
But that doesn’t matter; you’re not actually here to debate in good faith.
“When our position on an issue is no longer based on curiosity and the desire for the truth, but a desire to win a debate. When someone reaches this stage of discourse, there’s no need to try and persuade them.”
You are booming too hard here lol
Jfc
I’ve never heard that phrase. What does it mean?
There are “book deserts” where it can be difficult to visit a public library.
There are plenty of articles showing how libraries across the country are closing, usually in poor neighborhoods.
Imagine permitting this to be done to your child 🤡
Most parents probably don’t even know it’s happening.
Why? What’s inaccurate about it? I have no idea and would like to learn.
This is a false anecdote and outdated too.
How so?
They did once:
“Facebook’s phone collaboration with HTC was a flop back in 2013.”
Fuck Musk
Sounds like a French parfum.
Good question. He definitely seems like the type that would have a dungeon with captives.
IIRC that was what happened.
And even though it’s being labeled as a “consumer privacy law” it was actually spurred by a politician getting upset that people might find out what he was renting. It was a self-serving law that had the side effect of also helping consumers.
Here’s the most recent example:
The browser that promises “no shady privacy notices or advertiser backdoors” on its storefront has suddenly added an experimental feature to beam user interactions to advertisers and enables it by default. Many are not happy.
I never thought about it that way. Interesting. Thanks!
deleted by creator
I’ll have to admit, I looked at the cliffside pictures during the hype. I fell for the Streisand Effect in its original form.
Imaginationland.
That’s a lie. You used that as an argument twice (that I saw, maybe more).
You: No one is forced to use a laptop. Libraries exist with free internet access and computer.
Also you: Good thing poor people have access to public libraries. I know from experience
No, I didn’t argue with you about that. That was an argument you were having with multiple other people. I just called you out on the fact that what you were claiming about libraries is not always true for everyone. I cited my source and proved you wrong. Yet you still seem to want to argue so you decided to change the subject of our debate.
I already said what I wanted to say. Unlike you I don’t feel the need to argue about everything.
You have been antagonistic toward everyone in this post that you’ve interacted with. What makes you think anyone would have any respect for you enough to be polite? If you are combative then people will most likely be combative in their replies.
I find it somewhat sad that you keep saying that to people you get tired of debating. You say it a lot. Please feel free to add me to that list. I’ll survive.