I think there point is that Linux support hasn’t really increased Linux native games. It’s possible it’s even hurt it as they can just develop for one platform - windows.

To add another layer, I actually run it as a container - Steam Headless

Theyve been rolling out intellisense for the terminal in Vscode, it’s completely breaking tab complete for me.

I have one machine where I run steam as a headless instance as I just use it for remoteplay to the TV.

All of them. If you’re seeing sources cited, it means it’s a RAG (LLM with extra bits). The extra bits make a big difference as it means the response is limited to a select few points of reference and isn’t comparing all known knowledge on a subject matter.

Thanks for the details, seems like that may be why the older Chromecasts are still supported.

I thought for Chromecast the “casting” part is just telling the Chromecast what to play. Do you need your phone on while Chromecast shows content?

Healthcare before the current admin did recommend both. You’ve got a really bad doctor/Healthcare support system if they aren’t telling you eating healthy and exercise do a lot for your wellbeing.

The big issue is that medical research is a lot harder and more expensive than just “be healthy”. Cutting back funding/efforts there has long term cascading effects.

I mean a big difference there is that the switch can only play games that run on it. There are going to be games that don’t run on the steam machine (or at least we’ll), just as there aren’t games that run on the steamdeck.

I think it will still do well, but that’s a big difference between the switches approach to low power vs the steam machine.

The qoute says the “authors”, so this law is not exclusively tied to actors, but generally works of art and the people involved in creating it. Thats why I called out things like remakes.

And while you are right that in many of my examples there would probably be contracts to avoid these issues, my point was to show how easy it is to break this law (and that copyright owners do it all the time themselves).

Also, fair use for parodies is not a thing in all countries - not sure if it is in Denmark.

That only works up to a point before nations push back. Additionally it assumes there is value in those assets. If there really is a train that stops in the middle of nowhere, you’re probably never recouping those costs.

Yeah, it also seems weird cause things like remakes, parodies, trailers, etc. all would technically violate that law.

Deflation can be really damaging because it disincentivizes things like investments and longterm projects. Here are a couple of examples:

• One of the biggest issues with mortgages is if you are under water (can you pay off your debt if you sell the house). With deflation, you could buy a house today and owe more than the house is worth tomorrow.
• If the total cost to manufacture a car is $X, but by the time I can sell the car the market would only pay $X-50, then I’m actually better off not making the car.

Essentially, high deflationary pressure causes people to hold their money and not spend it. It’s what happened in Japan around 1990s-2010s resulting in basically negative growth in their economy - Source

Hyper inflation is a similar issue, but on the other end. The value of money is lost so quickly that things like life savings can become worthless due to money losing its value so rapidly.

I’m really confused by this one. Usually China seems to take the smart calculated move, but this knee jerk reaction seems to just prove the Dutch made the right move.

If China feels like it can just cut off these chips whenever they want, then there was a real risk to continuing business as usual.

While I think the US was overstepping in how it pressured the Dutch, the overall outcome highlights the continued risk of relying on China for these supply chains.

Additionally Toyota seems the least impacted as they’ve apparently been shifting away from reliance on China for these chips, furthering proving that’s a smart move.

Yeah, in the article they even say manufacturers don’t provide any guarantees against physical attacks.

That’s fair, but expect to see even more of this in the future.

China historically has done a lot to protect their domestic industries (blocking access to the country, currency manipulation to keep prices cheap, required state involvement, etc.). That’s not to say other countries haven’t (US with Bailouts and Itar, etc.).

However, I would expect to see more of this across the world as globalization takes a bit of a hit. Both from rising tensions, but also from some of the fragility in supply chains exposed due to the pandemic.

It’s not like China hasn’t had protectionist policies. Why do you think they don’t let google/etc. operate within the country.

I can’t speak for this specific approach/system, but no. LLMs never really guarantee anything, and for translation roles like this, it’s hard to say how much help they provide. The main issue being that you now have to understand what the LLM generated before you can start fixing it and/or debugging it.

https://www.theregister.com/2025/06/13/danish_department_dump_microsoft/

Dutch moving away from US based software companies to have more ownership of the digital infrastructure is pretty similar to locking down more of their hardware infrastructure.

And that was with two seconds of googling.

You seem to be posing this as if there are only two sides, and that the Dutch (and Europe in general) don’t have their own self interests.

Many policies lately from the EU have been pushing back on both US and Chinese interests.