jaxxed

Me neither. Please give me as little as possible.

More likely, he is trying to not call out the US, as they can be sensitive about needing help.

The Chinese models have more features, more technology, and more connectivity.

Bcschefs was removed from the kernel, but it qas because Kent doesn’t play well with others, and not because of the technical side. BCachefs had a lot of potential, but it serves noone to end up in another Resier situation.

Kent had a habit of pushing for wider kernel changes to support the FS, without working with the community, which will always break things. He is also very ego driven, and self-obsessed, which is not always a bad thing.

Linus’ person-to-persin issues always started from a technical perspective, so it is different.

Putting AI against AI is as much about saving human resources, as it is about gaining value.

Let the machines argue among themselves.

I bet you can install a pipewire-pulse package, and it will repkace your pulse installation (I have no debian experience)

It should be ~/.local/bin

Then require them as identification for voting

I am never goi g to need so.ething with a hogher refreh rate than 240hz. Why are they making 500hz?

Can you comment further on the three mesh networks rhat you use?

I only use zigbee, but would consider branching out

I don’t understand why there aren’t more EU fabs, as the EUV machines are made there.

Is there anybody left who thinks that openai is going to survive? I don’t think it has 6 months of life left.

I’m not comparing it. I watched an interview with one of the openZFS guys, who talked about how engineering designs based on spinny things are hard to get to work on solid-state drives.

Their product may be one of the best, but they are more expensive, and they have no hope of making enough revenue to float their business.

MS and Google float their AI with their other profits, so it can work as a business model.

I had a FreeBSD niri setup that worked quite well for a bit. The jail-based containerd stuff was exciting, but not mature enough for my needs, so I had to leave it behind. Since then I’ve read lots of news about maturing wifi and ither improvements.

Graphics will always be behind, unforrunatrly; ZFS is starting to show its age too.

I think you have the wrong tone.

The comainers were nvidia, when they didn’t participate in the early anni g, and then cam in late trying to push a rewrite to the memory sharing model.

Was that just my fantasy, or did other people have the same drean? I did mention that I was an early adotper. Maybe I should have clarified that I never went back.

Listen, no matter your opinion on wayland, you can admit that some technical decisions made were not optimal.

The issue with wayland is that both the process and the base mechanisms had significqnt flaws, that made it take a long time to get things working. In all fairness, the core team uad a valiant effort for a dwcade, hampered by unresponsive complainers, and late-to-the-party suggestions.

Fyi: I am an early WL adopter, but not on any of the major DEs.

The CCP is not a transparent governing body, by any means, but there is no second body of officials pulling strings. There is no need for a hidden government, as much of the CCP’s dynamics is hidden anyway. Most public decision making is ceremonial, with decisions being made in advance, and opposition being rare.

Xi was picked for succession by his predecessor, Hu.

When Xi was picked, he was picked for the same reasons that Putin was picked - they looked like mild centrist candidates (ironic) Over the last decade, Xi hss focused a lot more on gaining authoritarian control over the party, the military, and the economy - using the law, and power plays. This has taken a lot of power from both the Capitalists, and the princelings.

Ask Jack Ma if he is still happy with Xi.

This wave is likely not as paranoud as you may think. I’ve seen a number of utube commentators talking about a large power struggle in the CCP over the last six months.