![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://beehaw.org/pictrs/image/c0e83ceb-b7e5-41b4-9b76-bfd152dd8d00.png)
I don’t see how this is so difficult. Given the choice between a narcissistic billionaire or an independent, accountable government commission that’s bound by the rule of law, I’ll choose the latter every time.
I don’t see how this is so difficult. Given the choice between a narcissistic billionaire or an independent, accountable government commission that’s bound by the rule of law, I’ll choose the latter every time.
With this approach you would lose the subvolume structure and deduplication if I’m not mistaken.
No, you got downvoted because you were insulting and incorrect.
The most common physical attacks will be you misplacing your device or some friend/burglar/cop taking it. FDE works great in those scenarios.
RCS is walled off by design, so that users are dependent on Google and their phone carrier. If they wanted an open standard they would have adopted something like XMPP.
Do you have experience with Spanish employment law?
You can’t just compare the file sizes without looking at the quality. Each will have different quality loss depending on the exact encodings used.
Yes, it is generally a good idea to put internet-facing servers on a network that is separated from the local network. The point of this is not to minimize their attack surface (since they are already connected to the internet after all) but to prevent them from being used as a stepping stone for attacks on your internal network. To make this effective, you should block traffic from the internet-facing network to the rest of your network and treat it as potentially untrusted.
“Gen Z simply uses technology more than any other generation and is therefore more likely to be scammed via that technology.”
raid is essential anyway
Why? If there are offsite backups that can be restored in an acceptable time frame, what’s still the point of RAID?
It seems like this order is rather limited and the IA can continue almost all of their work.
If you turn the fan up high enough it will blow the heat from outside into the house. Trust me, I’m a scientists.
Good. Hopefully this will discourage people from using Clownflare’s DNS.
In case you don’t know, Cloudflare already controls a massive amount of websites, have access to their unencrypted traffic and are making the web inaccessible for people who use tor or noscript. They are a threat to the open web.
Communication network providers in the EU generally aren’t liable for illegal activity of their users.
For the last time: these language models are just regurgitating what people have said. They don’t analyze or reason.
It’s what the ePrivacy directive says, yes. But some get around this by claiming that it’s necessary for the operation of the device/service (doubtful) or that it has limited effect on privacy (depends on exceptions created by member states)
National courts to take EU law into account. If you don’t agree with their interpretation of EU law, your option is to appeal or ask to refer questions to the EUCJ.
That’s not accurate. Copyright and trademark are two different things. The name “twitter” is also just a combination of preexisting characters and the word was probably in use before the company was founded. You can still trademark existing things because trademarks are about preventing consumer confusion, not protecting original creations.
Musk does have a problem with copyright if it turns out this specific design was made by someone else.
Such is the fate of hypercentralized spaces. The fediverse fixes this.