mechoman444

Nope. I’m 100% aware.

And neither is this.

No.

If you say so… I’m glad you trust them.

But for me in answer to your question it’s a no.

No.

Ya… Humans so far have made everything not produced by Nature on Earth. 🤷

Ya of course I do. Humans are the most unreliable slick disgusting diseased morally inept living organisms on the planet.

Good for you.

My auto correct doesn’t care.

In that case let’s stop calling it ai, because it isn’t and use it’s correct abbreviation: llm.

Alprozolam is generic for Xanax. Which is a severe anti anxiety drug and heavily abused on the street.

Again YouTube ads? What the hell are you people talking about?

Many city’s don’t allow neon at all. ☹️

Yes of course but it’s marketing data.

Marketing data. We need it for marketing to people so they can spend money.

Don’t you understand! Marketing data!!!

Pervertube. Thisvid. Motherless.

I just realized indicating these websites might have revealed a little too much about the kinds of porn I like to watch. ☹️

Absolute moron. You absolute moron. Once again my argument is about nationalizing a private company.

Is there anything that you’d like to talk about concerning that!

I don’t give two flying fucks who runs space x. Once again. I’m not defending Elon in anyway.

I am expressing my concern about the United States government nationalizing a private company. You’re still making bassless assumptions. Pull your head out of your own ass and actually think about what I’m saying before spouting off at the mouth.

I’m sorry were you talking to me? Because nothing in your response had anything to do with what I actually said.

I never claimed to like Elon. I don’t. I never expressed support for this administration’s policies. I don’t.

My argument is about the moral, ethical, and historically dangerous precedent of nationalizing a private company.

That drug-addled sycophant stood before the most powerful political body on Earth wearing a baseball cap and a T-shirt while the Vice President of the United States told President Zelensky to put on a suit.

Unbelievable.

Where the hell do you get off making wild, baseless assumptions about things you barely understand? What exactly prevents you from engaging in civil discourse like an adult, instead of spouting off like you did in that comment?

Fine if we’re slinging assumptions now, here’s mine: You strike me as a fedora-wearing, vape-huffing, woman-hating neckbeard. Am I wrong? Don’t care. That’s the image your words paint.

If the government actually nationalized SpaceX, the precedent would be insane. You’d be telling every private company working in defense, infrastructure, or tech that if they become too essential, the government might just take it. Doesn’t matter how much risk or capital they fronted.

SpaceX isn’t just launching rockets for fun—it’s practically a branch of the U.S. space program at this point. GPS, Starlink for military comms, launching classified payloads, putting astronauts in orbit. If we nationalize that over a political pissing match between Trump and Musk, we’re basically saying innovation is conditional on obedience.

And let’s be honest—once you do this to SpaceX, you open the door to doing it to AWS, Tesla’s energy grid systems, Google’s AI infrastructure. Any private company that gets too important suddenly becomes “too critical to stay private.” That’s a fast track to killing private innovation in sectors where we need it most.

If Trump’s threatening funding, and Musk is threatening to walk, and the public’s response is “just take the company,” then we’ve officially politicized the tech-industrial base. That’s not governance, that’s dysfunction.

Nationalizing SpaceX would be a Cold War move in a modern economy. It might feel good in the moment, but long-term, it’s a terrible idea.

The precedent that will set and the implications… No… We should not do this.