The didn’t get to vote on it

Duh

I think platforms can dissallow some unreasonable content without 3rd parties trying to police all porn

No I’m supporting shut down of streaming channels that appear to show abuse or harm in a non functional context that is either non consentual or that no reasonable person would consent to.

Almost every website has a TOS and censors some stuff against said terms. You act like its not already nornal to have standards for conduct.

Why should they err on that side again?

Yes to some degree obviously I want some editorial control. For instance I don’t want people posting snuff films or child porn and I want sited that wouldn’t remove such themselves removed.

Because they by running a business are responsible to ensure that they don’t promote or willfully ignore harm brought about wholly or in part by their actions or negligence.

For actually moral folks the minimum the law requires is a starting point not the last word.

Eg moral folks ask is there anything I am doing that causes harm or anything I’m not doing that I reasonably ought to do to prevent it.

Smart people too as many governments take a dim view of dodging responsibly and will invent new laws to regulate you.

Notably hamas being essentially the government there includes clerks cooks janitors, plumbers.

Kinda hard to personally blow up the building where bob the plumber sleeps killing him his kids and 10 other folks and claim to have hit any military targets.

Governments often claim to kill a military target when they kill a prime age male even without realistically identifying a combatant especially where bombing is used.

It’s probably closer to 80-90% civilians

You cannot actually serve hundreds of millions in the US even if you invested the 75B it would cost to give every household a satellite it just can’t support the bandwidth.

Anything with a very low rate of true positives applied to a large population is going to have an insane false positive rate. EG a 1 in 7M issue applied to 70M students with a 1% false positive rate would produce 700k false positives. Worse people who are actually planning a school shooting may be more likely to avoid telegraphing their intentions. So you could damage 700k kids futures and traumatize them without even catching many or any of the killers.

They in the last year or so added built in vertical tabs , much better hardware support for decoding video on Linux, continue to support manifest v2 and high quality ad blocking. Have increased performance and memory usage.

In the last 7 years performance is night and day different as is multiple process performance and switched away from unmaintainable old broken addon system.

They also created one of the premiere programming languages which is making in roads in the Linux kernel.

Which literally means they have to announce fake plans to build which be continually delayed until at least 2028

It absolutely is private insofar as it is a channel between the software running on their end -> user who is operating the software. The lack of end to end encryption does not make it not private it makes it insecure which doesn’t speak whatsoever to the issue raised which is that creation of an image by a user isn’t likely to be considered publication until they share it.

It’s highly probable that keeping people from generating deep fake nudes requires additional law.

The article says Tesla deletes it and was forced to produce it. Seems pretty obvious that your theory is wrong

Is providing it over a private channel to a singular user publication?

I suspect that you will have to directly regulate image generation

Perhaps most importantly although we know it was not so lost because we read the article or at least the summary if it had been it would have been a deliberate design decision to have it be so.

Your explanation doesn’t wash in reality but it also doesn’t wash even in theory.

Because it may not be possible to transmit depending on location. Also non violtile storage is cheap and fast and ram is normally limited

This explanation is completely fabricated, based on nothing, and nonsense.

It is obviously critical data that nobody halfway competent would write to ram. Also video data is very large and makes no sense to store in ram.

Furthermore the article says it was deleted and they later recovered it which would not have been possible with RAM

Basically why are you pushing this drivel.

The overwhelming majority of Linux users are on 4 distros + derivatives. Debian Fedora Arch Suse not “thousands”

Where would what end? Most actually open source projects just publish releases to source and provide as much or as little support as they feel like. Slap a github issues page up and tell every user that you are only interested in dealing with bugs in the most recent version in whatever official channel you prefer eg provide appimage of releases and insist that users reproduce and document bug.

Time wasted mostly wont even bother to create a github account and if they do close issues if they can’t follow directions.