I just don’t feel comfortable building a robot army here, and then being ousted

Why would you ever have any control whatsoever in the first place? Do other arms manufacturers have a control for their missiles?

Mint has basically contained bad decision making by Ubuntu and individual versions are supported for 5 years. The average computer lasts 6 before replacement.

Mint is fairly future proof I think.

Any bad thing the user wants to do with the car can already be done by the person with the keys. Allowing the user more control could prevent someone including a terrorist or enemy state from doing something bad to millions of people like virtually cutting everyone’s brakes at once.

They created the cost with their actions. The government should take every penny of value down to the CEOS kids toys and then foot any costs not paid for.

Have you considered that just “reaping old process IDs” wasn’t enough responsibility for an init daemon on a secure, robust system? That maybe it should be protecting other parts of the system and tracking the liveness of a desired service?

What is the benefit of specifically doing that in init?

If I see an argument like this then I can only assume the interlocutor doesn’t do software engineering.

Its more likely that the user simply has simple needs like running stuff at startup which any init system can do and doesn’t see as much benefits as poster.

Also who loves systemd-resolved?

https://discourse.practicalzfs.com/t/advantages-of-zfs-on-a-single-disk-vs-btrfs/850

alternativeto.net

Me and my wife both have desktop PC. The Windows version just has an installer as one would expect. The Linux version I used is the variety you just unzip in a directory and run from there which is about as easy.

I have configured each machine to have a stable IP on the LAN and bookmarked it and if we want to watch each others content we just click on the bookmark for each others jellyfin.

You have to run it as a service if you want it to run at all it has no GUI save for its web interface available when the service is running

Need to stream at home or away from home?

The didn’t get to vote on it

Duh

I think platforms can dissallow some unreasonable content without 3rd parties trying to police all porn

No I’m supporting shut down of streaming channels that appear to show abuse or harm in a non functional context that is either non consentual or that no reasonable person would consent to.

Almost every website has a TOS and censors some stuff against said terms. You act like its not already nornal to have standards for conduct.

Why should they err on that side again?

Yes to some degree obviously I want some editorial control. For instance I don’t want people posting snuff films or child porn and I want sited that wouldn’t remove such themselves removed.

Because they by running a business are responsible to ensure that they don’t promote or willfully ignore harm brought about wholly or in part by their actions or negligence.

For actually moral folks the minimum the law requires is a starting point not the last word.

Eg moral folks ask is there anything I am doing that causes harm or anything I’m not doing that I reasonably ought to do to prevent it.

Smart people too as many governments take a dim view of dodging responsibly and will invent new laws to regulate you.

Notably hamas being essentially the government there includes clerks cooks janitors, plumbers.

Kinda hard to personally blow up the building where bob the plumber sleeps killing him his kids and 10 other folks and claim to have hit any military targets.

Governments often claim to kill a military target when they kill a prime age male even without realistically identifying a combatant especially where bombing is used.

It’s probably closer to 80-90% civilians

You cannot actually serve hundreds of millions in the US even if you invested the 75B it would cost to give every household a satellite it just can’t support the bandwidth.