Let’s just make it 0 already, get it over with.

I’m wondering how that stacks up to human drivers. Since the data is redacted I’m guessing not well at all.

Right, he worked 1 hours, then 2, then 3, then 2.5, then (1, then 2, … (…)) without any breaks!

Not your fault that the Internet is full of casual misinformation. None of us are immune from that.

American here, trick question, it’s E. Irrelevant, the driver is only paid through tips and the employer doesn’t pay payroll taxes, so his working hours are of no consequence.

If they planned a 1 month migration of a small component, 6 months to complete would be pretty lucky imo. Refactoring Legacy Code mentions the 2.0 approach they’re taking. Spoiler alert, it doesn’t work…

You could mass edit your comment history to be the same comment you got banned for. That’s what I did to cope 🖕I got banned from 5 more subreddits over it, looking at the b.s. excuses brought me some closure. The comment was “Musk’s fumes are fatally toxic”. Instaban.

Clearly they’re antisemitic, since there is at least 1 Jewish person in India.

Mass edit your comments while you still can. I got halfway through my history before being blocked.

Welcome friend!!

You can’t just cite established law without thinking about what Musk/Trump think. What do you think this is, a democracy?

I did. I got banned for “Musk fuming is fatally toxic”. The platform is dead now. I bet he has good dirt on Huffman.

This news report is antisemitic! /s

Yep it’s literally half of the results. I’m astounded that this is legal. Well not that astounded.

I’m not racist. I’m just really into 1940’s German artillery. For the engineering, you know. /s

That is one hell of a way to lose an argument, oof. I thought it was fitting that you were gaslighting a false narrative until the very end. Definite grade school bully vibes. 10/10 would debate again.

Brave search allows misinformation goggles for anyone that believes 2 + 2 = 5.

You win the argument. I concede that 2 plus 2 indeed equals 5. By rejecting any evidence, not actually refuting my points and making up your own logic, your argument is identical to 1+1=3, therefore proving 2+2=5, which is what my first question was. Up is down, you win the argument, and Republicans didn’t cheat. I applaud your bliss and ignorance, sir.

That is pants on fire false. In many cases ballots were rejected for no reason and had to be recast. Democrats and especially Black people were affected disproportionately, why do you think that is only the case in 2024? There is evidence of this being instructed to GOP party leaders as a strategy. And even if true, do you think it’s “fair” to make an all black community stand in line for 3 hours to vote because you removed mail in ballots? Does this not meet the definition of “chest”?

You’ve dodged my actual question 3 times so I win this argument by default. What evidence would it take? You are arguing in bad faith because the answer is none. Look I understand you need to believe you won and your side didn’t cheat despite the evidence. It’s cool, you just go with that.

What evidence would you need to see to convince you? Would any evidence convinced you or do you choose to believe without caring about reality?