Typical. So basically, they’re gonna turn America into Texas. Their power grid is famously shitty and has been neglected for decades due to Republican control of the government. They are constantly kicking the can down the road for some other administration to deal with it.

Everyone time there’s even a slight dusting of snow anywhere in Texas the power grid shuts off and people freeze to death. But Texas refuses to fix the power grid and nationalize because it would mean investing and bringing their shitty substandard power grid up to modern standards.

They’re creating artificial demand And capitalizing on it to sell you a new phone and power, charger and accessories, and all kinds of other crap.

The convenience is being able to sit your fat ass on the couch and yell vaguely in the direction of a smart assistant to turn off the lights without having to get off the couch.

The idea that a smart refrigerator could tell you when you’re about out of milk or coming up on the expiration date instead of having to open your fridge and take a look is cool but the privacy and other implications outweigh the benefits.

It’s a mild convenience that supposedly frees up extra time to do something else. The sad part is that something else is usually staying glued to your phone, social media, or TV.

There has to be some sort of reasonable balance between new developments and longevity.

Asking any engineer for a device that’s near indestructible but will continue to have software updates for 10 years is a hard ask.

For a lot of devices right to repair would work just fine. Being able to swap out battery extends the life of most cell phones. But it’s an unreasonable request for that cell phone, for example, to be able to be supported for 10 years worth of software updates.

It will slow the development cycle for a lot of devices down quite a bit. Which honestly is fine. I feel like a lot of products have reached maturity, and companies are reinventing them just for the sake of reinventing them and selling a “new” product with a new battery. I’m looking at you, Apple.

The problem with determining what is an acceptable lifecycle for a product is that there will be no one left to support the product in 10 years if the company folds in the meantime. It is a significant drag on companies to support legacy products while also innovating and creating new products. It’s just a fact a fact.

And from a consumer perspective, If you want cool, new fancy, shiny shit every year and for it to be reliable and last for 10 years, it’s just not gonna happen. We have been trained To buy new shit every year and desire that new shiny upgrade Without understanding that we’re getting cheap shitty products for a premium.

Your $100” iPhone is now going to become a $3000 iPhone that lasts for five years instead of two. Tell me how that’s a win for anybody?

Don’t forget that squirrel, raccoon, and possum meat. That’s where the magic flavor comes from!

They look nice because no one’s allowed to use them. They build stuff, but the population is too poor or not privileged enough to be able to use anything. It just looks nice and it’s empty. Just like democracy.

Why anyone would want a corporate government surveillance wire tap that’s connected to the Internet and constantly listening for voice command is beyond me.

My friend used an Alexa and smart plugs to rewire all the lights in his house because it was cheaper to get the Wi-Fi connected lights and sockets rather than rewiring the whole house.

In order to keep the thing running, no one was allowed to touch any of the lights switches on the walls because it would break the system. It was fucking hilarious listening to him yell at his Alexa to turn on the lights in the living room and have it turn on the dining room instead.

He even had the screen on the base that would follow you around as you were walking in the house and this creepy screen would constantly be monitoring you while waiting for commands.

If anyone walked in it just looked like he was screaming at the top of his refrigerator about the lights in the house.

AI and the investment around it are literally the only thing holding up America’s economy right now. If you take the artificial growth and the vast amounts of investment that are being pumped in AI development data centers, the US economy has barely grown half percentage point.

No surprise that they are going to power this beast at all costs until it falls apart along with the US economy.

While I agree that something needs to be done, stronger regulations will just be in an added requirement for the development of these devices, which will make it more expensive.

You can’t have fast development, cheap things, and longevity. Companies will not invest in making those products because they’ll be out of business by the time their market is saturated.

Yeah, my favorite is when they figure out what features people are willing to pay for and then paywal everything that makes an app useful.

And after they monetize that fully and realize that the money is not endless, they switch to a subscription model. So that they can have you pay for your depreciating crappy software forever.

But at least you know it kind of works while you’re paying for it. It takes way too much effort to find some other unknown piece of software for the same function, and it is usually performs worse than what you had until the developers figure out how to make the features work again before putting it behind a paywall and subscription model again again.

But along the way, everyone gets to be miserable from the users to the developers and the project managers. Everyone except of course, the shareholders Because they get to make money, no matter how crappy their product, which they don’t use anyway, becomes.

A great recent example of this is Plex. It used to be open source and free, then it got more popular and started developing other features, and I asked people to pay reasonable amount for them.

After it got more popular and easy to use and set up, they started jacking up the prices, removing features and forcing people to buy subscriptions.

Your alternative now is to go back to a less fully featured more difficult to set up but open source alternative and something like Jellyfin. Except that most people won’t know how to set it up, there are way less devices and TVs will support their software, and you can’t get it to work easily for your technologically illiterate family and or friends.

So again, Your choices are stay with a crappy commercialized money-grubbing subscription based product that at least works and is fully featured for now until they decide to stop. Or, get a new, less developed, more difficult to set up, highly technical, and less supported product that’s open source and hope that it doesn’t fall into the same pitfalls as its user base and popularity grows.

Yeah, that only worked on small contractors when he was building his casinos because they didn’t have the infinite Russian money for lawyers.

Turns out that doesn’t work so well on sovereign nations and international corporations.

The answer is simpler than you might think. Progressive policies often ask you to change things that you don’t want change for the benefit of a larger group.

The idea that new policy will fix old problems and magically make things better is simply laughable.

Add in a constant stream of nostalgia that is constantly tells the younger generations how everything used to be better back in the good old days, and none of this should be a surprise.

Why the fuck would anybody support progressive policies that make their life more difficult, more cumbersome, and add extra bureaucratic red tape so that somebody else might benefit 50 years from now?

Why would anybody agree to make changes in their life and adopt progressive policies that make things more difficult and more restrictive while constantly being told about how used to be so much better before the government stepped in and decided that this is bad for you can’t have it anymore.

Right wing = conservative = people don’t like change. So yeah, people are const being told how things used to be better and resisting new policies that they don’t like that make things worse.

What a hard concept.

Let’s use recycling as an example. Before recycling was sold to everyone as the way to save the planet, everyone put all the trash in one can and it went to the dump.

Somewhere down the line, corporations managed to convince government that everyone should help them recycle the packaging trash that they produced. Recycling is good and will save the environment if everyone does their part.

Fast-forward 40 years and now there’s 8 different bins to separate all of the different types of plastic and glass and metal and paper and trash. And who has to do all of this work? yiu and me and everyone except the corporations that created it in the first place.

Why is the corporation that created that garbage and plastic waste not responsible for us clean up in the first place? Why are these progressive policies such as recycling everyone’s face instead of solving the problem which is too much plastic packaging?

Are you surprised that people would not want to recycle because it’s a huge pain in the ass specially in rural places where there is garbage collection and everything has to be sorted manually at the dump?

Are you surprised that people don’t like California’s restrictive emissions, laws, and anti-modification laws? But it’s good for the environment. It will improve the air quality. Gasoline is bad.

Why would I wanna buy a new car that runs shittier needs more maintenance brakes but it is environmentally friendly? (go do some research on how the EGR system works for diesel engines and tell me that you want that shit on your car)

Seems like a better solution would be to increase public transportation so people don’t need a fucking car as their primary mode of transportation.

But it’s much easier to guilt trip people into thinking their car is bad for the environment and convince them that they need to be the savior of the fucking planet then it is to legislate and force oil companies and car companies that want to sell more oil and more cars.

My point is people keep getting told life used to be easier things used to be better and everything sucks now in order to fix it. We need to pass these laws which no one wants and surprise that people are voting for the conservative part is it we don’t want to change shit.

Conservative parties have a lot of other way worse ideas as they relate to social issues and societal problems. Usually the easiest solutions to scape goat somebody else and say hey this group of people over here sucks. They are the cause of all your problems not these corporations and rich fucks who pay us lots of money to ignore you and your needs.