Cool cool. I was worried that it might be a piss poor diagram made by a 10 year old just learning Photoshop or something.
When it comes to electronic diagrams, I’m used to seeing complete pinouts that label every single pin, like ground, power, data and clock signals and whatnot.
Seeing such an incomplete diagram like this one just scares me though.
Why is the diagram incomplete? It shows both sides of the socket, but only one side of the card. Are the pins really staggered like that?
I never trust incomplete diagrams, and I’m not finding a proper diagram that shows both sides to confirm or deny anything.
I’m not hands on familiar with these standards, so I’m not entirely sure. But when I see a diagram showing 4 pins on one side and 3 pins on the other, but the card going into it only shows one side, then it raises immediate red flags of incomplete information.
I’m not entirely sure myself with current tech, but when we got our first external adapter for SSD drives for MacBooks, the connector was made so sloppy that you’d literally have to manually make sure it was aligned properly in the slot.
There was like half a millimeter of slop in the slot where if you inserted it incorrectly, everything would lose its magic smoke…
Be very wary of the staggered pins in the diagram. I don’t trust the diagram.
Did you not notice the staggered pinout on the diagram? That looks like it’s literally designed to be a short circuit no matter what the manual says.
I’ve literally dealt with staggered pin short circuits twice in my life, one from equipment damage, and another from piss poor engineering.
Either way it’ll totally fry the power supply, if not more…
I cannot confirm anything here, but that diagram scares the fuck out of me.
Why? I’ve worked on over 1000 phones, and never have I seen a screen protector interfere with touch sensitivity. Not even if it was a redneck packing tape protector on a broken screen.
Now the wet fingers thing makes sense though, but is it really as effective as they claim?
Plus absolutely no mention of how much energy the Merlin AI servers will consume, when AI server farms are known to consume enough energy to power a village or small city…
Title is confusing.
Edit: Isuzu uses at least some GMC sensors. So please explain to me where the confusion is.
Oh that’s right, they’re cross compatible, or at least they once were…
All they gotta do is change their company name to avoid lawsuits. Anyone got any ideas for a new name for them?.. 🤔
ClusterFuck comes to mind…
Still, with billions of dollars in losses across the globe and all the various impacts it’s having on people’s lives, is nobody gonna be held accountable? Will they just end up charging CrowdStrike as a whole a measly little fine compared to the massive losses the event caused?
One of their developers goofed up pretty bad, but in a fairly simple and forgivable way. The real blame should go on the higher ups that decided that full proper testing wasn’t necessary before deployment.
So yes, they really need to review their policies and procedures before pressing that deploy button.
Indeed, I fully agree. They obviously neglected on testing before deployment. So you can split the blame between the developer that goofed on the null pointer dereferencing and the blank null file, and the higher ups that apparently decided that proper testing before deployment wasn’t necessary.
Ultimately, it still boils down to human error.
Watch the video that I linked as an edit from Dave Plummer, he explains it rather well. The driver was signed, it was the rolling update definition files from CrowdStrike that were unsigned.
Hey, why not just ask Dave Plummer, former Windows developer…
https://youtube.com/watch?v=wAzEJxOo1ts
When anywhere from 8.5 million to over a billion systems went down, numbers I’ve read so far vary significantly, still that’s way too much failure for a simple borked update to a kernel level driver, not even made by Microsoft.
If you were a developer that knew you were responsible for developing ring zero code, massively deployed across corporate systems across the world, then you should goddamned properly test the update before deploying it.
This isn’t a simple glitch like a calculation rounding error or some shit, the programmers of any ring zero code should be held fully responsible, for not properly reviewing and testing the code before deploying an update.
Edit: Why not just ask Dave Plummer, former Windows developer…
I hope this incident shines more light on the greedy rich CEOs and the corners they cut, the taxes they owe, the underpaid employees and understaffed facilities, and now probably some hefty fines, as just a slap on the wrist of course…
I feel like everyone within developed countries should offer everyone a bare minimum free internet access. Like, even if it’s as slow as dialup, at least it would still be access.
Then, if you want high speed internet, which I’m sure most people would want, then you pay monthly for that of course.
But this whole thing they’re doing now, where they can throttle or even block sites at their own discretion for paying customers, well that’s just totally back-asswards…
Just screw it
Ouch. Good luck with that 🤞