![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
Ok, Arrowhead, I now want a backpack drone with this
woah holy shit a bio?
Ok, Arrowhead, I now want a backpack drone with this
Hahahahaha so it doesn’t break anything that still relies on cookies, but neuters the ability to share them.
That’s awesome
no.
You know, we can use vision ai services to do that now, dang yo time flies
Our man-hours come from leadership and architects so separated from code they can’t agree on drawings or what constitutes a micro service architecture or… Any real pattern at all.
Something I don’t get paid enough to understand - what constitutes contributions, and what’s the definition of selling the software?
For instance, I don’t think I’ve worked on a project where we have made changes to the source code for security policies (much quicker path to update immediately if something gets flagged). But I don’t think I know of an instance where we sell our software as a service - as far as I know it’s largely used to support other services we sell.
Except now that I say that, that’s not entirely true, we DO have a review board that we have to submit every third party library to and it takes forever to hear back but we have occasionally gotten a “no can’t use that” or “contract is pending.” So maybe I’m just super unaware of who reviews the third party software and they review the licenses.
That’s cool. The implication is that electron interference would prevent photons interacting with them? It makes a little sense to explain dark matter, but with the massive amounts of dark matter we observe, I doubt this is that common.
Not to mention, photons would still interact in the photonuclear way, scattering etc. it also presumes that the atoms won’t interact with anything else, causing the interference pattern to cease.
So do they like plan to do something with the massive amount of hospitals using Windows?
Like it seems to me that scraping PHI might be a bad idea
You better fucking believe it.
AIs are going to be the new outsource, only cheaper than outsourcing and probably less confusing for us to fix
Man that’s way too short to be a funny song
You must have missed my first statement? Unless you can justify $300-$400 more for the features I use in the Fitbit. Bonus points if you can make it into a funny song.
I literally just bought a Fitbit because I really needed a watch and it has the features I cared about and was way less expensive than a Garmin.
Honestly I think Google will cancel them because they compete with Android Wear or whatever which can’t hold a charge worth a damn. 24 hours for a Pixel Watch? Fuck right off.
I had to go back and reread. I really shouldn’t comment when I’m still in bed.
Is secure boot still required? Yes?
Can’t force me to do shit Microsoft. Your own OS prevents it :)
Yes, that is how you install the OS. I meant little strangenesses found in dell hardware that I might encounter
I wish I could find something to help me convert my dell laptop into a Debian device. It would be all sorts of fun.
I just like my build working. What’s wrong with that?
So it took a little while before I could run stable diffusion, I can now!
Woah woah woah hold on.
These are judges and lawyers, not software engineers.
Personally it sounds like the lawyers and whatnot can do the whole splitting up the business. It will simultaneously create a HUGE demand in software engineers as all this stuff just sort of stops working.
I think it’s a brilliant way to handle this.
Plus the effect it would have on software engineer salaries in general. Not that I have any potential conflict of interest in stating this opinion, not at all.
It… Is?